|
![]() |
|
| Author |
|
|||||||
|
Hyperslide
Posts: 38
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
Nice
Shame we wont see it for ages and good old Aussies came up with the technology ...AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE http://thefutureofthings.com/news/1237/60x-faster-internet.html |
|||||||
| #0 03:52pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
system
|
--
|
|||||||
| #0 |
|
|||||||
|
Hyperslide
Posts: 39
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
Nice OMG ..."Using photonic technology that has terabit per second speed, the circuit uses the scratch as a guide or a switching path for information" |
|||||||
| #1 03:53pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 8127
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
sounds nearly as fast as bigpond cable
|
|||||||
| #2 03:54pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Raven
Posts: 2838
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
terabit Jim, not kilobit.
|
|||||||
| #3 04:06pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 8129
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
wait did you say terabit?
|
|||||||
| #4 04:07pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Midda
Posts: 2399
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Everyone shut up, I can't hear Hyperslide.
|
|||||||
| #5 04:14pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Insom
Posts: 2355
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
should make my cs pings a bit better anyway
|
|||||||
| #6 04:19pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Spook
Posts: 22075
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
i still need my goat prons faster;
|
|||||||
| #7 04:20pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Hogfather
Posts: 1923
Location: Cairns, Queensland
|
Paging trog to this thread to tell us we don't need internets that fast!
|
|||||||
| #8 04:30pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Fireblood
Posts: 8365
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Wow! A terabyte a second!
Helloooooo streaming High Def movies! Video shops etc will be out of date! *Envisions steam-like product but for movies on your home theatre* |
|||||||
| #9 04:59pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
³dee
Posts: 2253
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Hmm and your hard drive will bog it down to 100mb/s!!!
And you memory will fill up in 10ms!@!! |
|||||||
| #10 05:02pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
mongie
Posts: 5403
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Video shops etc will be out of date! *Envisions steam-like product but for movies on your home theatre* um... Reeltime, AppleTV, etc. |
|||||||
| #11 05:31pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
mission
Posts: 3850
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
There was a thing on a kids show yesterday about new wireless technology, maybe what's liniked above (haven't looked yet) and it transmits using microwaves.
They have tested a wireless transmission using a full DVD movie and it took something like 6 seconds. |
|||||||
| #12 06:19pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Midda
Posts: 2400
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Wow! A terabyte a second! It's a terabit. Still very fast, but very different. And I stream 1080p movies over my 54Mbit wireless network, with plenty of bandwidth to spare. |
|||||||
| #13 06:24pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
icewyrm
Posts: 1982
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Somehow, I don't think this particular technology will be aimed at soho networks. Though I'd certainly like to have my own personal optically switched fibre network :) last edited by icewyrm at 19:37:26 15/Jul/08 |
|||||||
| #14 07:37pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
stinky
Posts: 2665
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
oh no, terrorbits! the internets just got spooky :(
|
|||||||
| #15 08:28pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Le Infidel
Posts: 2098
Location: Netherlands
|
well of course its spooky when goat pron is invovled, yes invovled
|
|||||||
| #16 08:30pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Midda
Posts: 2407
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Somehow, I don't think this particular technology will be aimed at soho networks. I just meant it in that you don't need as much bandwidth for HD movies as a lot of people seem to think. |
|||||||
| #17 08:31pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
infi
Posts: 9113
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
porn industry must be delighted.
|
|||||||
| #18 08:50pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
icewyrm
Posts: 1985
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Yea fair enough, I was thinking about the benefit of fatter/cheaper backbone links for content providers who wished to provide such a service in HD - for example, if you wanted to stream blu-ray (maximum bitrate approx 54 Mb/s) to 100,000 people, that already brings you up to 5.4 Tb/s, which is a pretty pricey piece of pipeline (especially internationally) as things stand.
|
|||||||
| #19 08:56pm 15/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Hyperslide
Posts: 43
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
porn industry must be delighted. LOL ...so true :P |
|||||||
| #20 11:28am 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Fireblood
Posts: 8367
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
um... Reeltime, AppleTV, etc. Ermm really? Wicked! Too bad I watch channel BT most of the time. AppleTV looks pretty wicked, but is it even available in australia? and dont you need the specific Apple TV to watch it all? |
|||||||
| #21 12:00pm 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Spook
Posts: 22082
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
isnt apple tv, just the box for storing medias on, which works on any tv?
|
|||||||
| #22 12:07pm 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Persay
Posts: 5066
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
im pretty happy with the speeed of bigpond cable tbh
|
|||||||
| #23 12:50pm 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
parabol
Posts: 4571
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
im pretty happy with the speeed of bigpond cable tbh What's the point of such high speed if you've got s***-all quota and have your uploads counted? It's like having a Ferrari that can only drive a block before it's out of petrol and has to be physically pushed to go any further (car analogy ftw). I think the monopoly issue here in Australia has to be resolved before we see any real-world benefits. (paging Telstra apologists to this thread) last edited by parabol at 13:07:24 16/Jul/08 |
|||||||
| #24 01:07pm 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
paradigm
Posts: 9
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
And I stream 1080p movies over my 54Mbit wireless network, with plenty of bandwidth to spare.Are you serious? 720p movies become choppy when I try to stream over wireless (wireless to ps3 though). |
|||||||
| #25 01:40pm 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
infi
Posts: 9122
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I think the monopoly issue here in Australia has to be resolved before we see any real-world benefits. unless we suddenly increase our population to 100 million things ain't gonna change. |
|||||||
| #26 01:43pm 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
thermite
Posts: 5
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
f*** for a faster future!
|
|||||||
| #27 01:52pm 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 8131
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I've been driving my ferrari top speed for 6 years no probs, with the exception of two months, both of which took a phone call of less than 10 minutes to fix
paging your anal retentive failure to this thread |
|||||||
| #28 02:17pm 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Persay
Posts: 5069
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
10gb is tonnes
|
|||||||
| #29 02:17pm 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Red
Posts: 169
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
if you wanted to stream blu-ray (maximum bitrate approx 54 Mb/s) to 100,000 people, that already brings you up to 5.4 Tb/s surely by the time we get to streaming blu-ray everyone will be using multicast so your argument is moot :D |
|||||||
| #30 02:42pm 16/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Hyperslide
Posts: 50
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
I think the monopoly issue here in Australia has to be resolved before we see any real-world benefits.unless we suddenly increase our population to 100 million things ain't gonna change. The corporate world will always screw us over ... I would love to see this change but my hopes are fleeting |
|||||||
| #31 10:29am 17/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Midda
Posts: 2420
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Are you serious? 720p movies become choppy when I try to stream over wireless (wireless to ps3 though). Yeah mate. The PS3 is connected to the router via cable, but my PC is wireless, I don't know if that makes a difference. My router is only 54Mbit over wireless, so the PS3 couldn't be getting the data any faster than that. |
|||||||
| #32 10:38am 17/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
TicMan
Posts: 3507
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I read an article about some scientists across Australia, China and Japan processing data taken from 3 seperate telescopes of the same spot in the sky at the same time to reduce the analysis time from a few weeks to a few seconds.
Previously they were having to drop the data onto tapes, send to a uni, restore from tapes, process, send back, etc so it was a lengthy process. The test was to network all their systems together to achieve the same result and it worked. Sounds boring, but the highlight was that within a short amount of time they had transferred around 10Tb of data over the few hours it took to record it all. They used their own network and not the commercial networks as they would be too cost prohibitive. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23917426-27702,00.html Each telescope in the recent experiment required 512 megabits a second of bandwidth and the total amount of data captured was about 10 terabytes -- the equivalent of about 40 computer hard disk drives -- for about 10 hours of observation. |
|||||||
| #33 10:39am 17/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Hyperslide
Posts: 55
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
Are you serious? 720p movies become choppy when I try to stream over wireless (wireless to ps3 though).Yeah mate. The PS3 is connected to the router via cable, but my PC is wireless, I don't know if that makes a difference. My router is only 54Mbit over wireless, so the PS3 couldn't be getting the data any faster than that. I had the same issue and same setup PS3 wired and PC wireless ... I switched over to CAT5 for both PC and PS3 and streaming wasn't an issue, you would thing that 54mbit would be enough but I put it down to something causing interference ...You might also find if ur using something like simple center to stream that might be the issue as well ...Hopefully this gives you a little insight |
|||||||
| #34 11:59am 17/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Midda
Posts: 2424
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
For the record, I'm sharing the movies using TVersity (not transcoding or anything), and there's only one thin wall between my PC and the router, so I have very good signal strength.
|
|||||||
| #35 12:01pm 17/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
icewyrm
Posts: 1987
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
surely by the time we get to streaming blu-ray everyone will be using multicast so your argument is moot :D Multicasting would be fine if you were just broadcasting a fixed stream, but if the users wants to play stuff on demand it's back to one to one as usual. On the other hand, if local caching was available for such a service, than the service could at least multicast content to the local caches, then let the local caches stream files individually to users. Of course, you'd want to have moved to IPv6 by then, for all the multicast enhancements. God knows how long it'll be until the average user has made (or been forced to make) the switch. you would thing that 54mbit would be enough but I put it down to something causing interference Keep in mind that you will never get close to 54 Mb/s actual throughput, because of all the additional overhead inherent in 802.11 based wireless - especially if you are using encryption for security (and I'd hope you would be, preferably wpa2). Since the maximum bitrate for blueray is 48 Mb/s on certain movies you may run out of bandwidth plain and simple, although a nice fat buffer would probably help with that. Edit: Apparently the maximum bitrate for blueray is 48 Mb/s for video+audio, or 54 MB/s for a data disc, my mistake. last edited by icewyrm at 13:23:44 17/Jul/08 |
|||||||
| #36 01:23pm 17/07/08 |
|
|||||||
|
system
|
--
|
|||||||
| #36 |
|
|||||||
|
| ||||||||