What if our universe was indeed a building block.
What if our universe was a building block of a multi-universal organism?
What if our universe contained enough energy to drive endothermic reactions to sustain an organism so massive, our existence was essential for its survival.
What if our universe was nothing but an energy factory, with its little workers rushing blindly towards their doom, carrying out their daily routines oblivious to their ill-fated lives.
What if Earth had the same significance as a cell in our human bodies?
What if Earth was nearing its cellular life?
What IF…..Indeed
Hey hey?

I would say something here but I reallly cant be bothered...

Yeh...i understand

Umm Ok

Pot can do that to people
I watched a 9 hour documentory on Stephen Hawkings once, i was blown away.
Told everyone about it 4 weeks, how it all worked and that.
Then i realised they don't care.
Nice thoughts though good work.
Think on dude

your right.. it is pretty stupid and you are wasting our time reading this trash.. I get enough spam in my mailbox as it is.. now it's on posts..

Yeh you find it stupid......becasuse your stupid.....other 'normal' people would find it interesting.....
Thanks for reading it though.....

I Thought....Once...





http://my.ausgamers.com/media/sig-45035.jpg

you have a vivid imagination my friend...

Umm thanks?
Friend?

Been thinkin' about that the last day or so. You might be right, you might be wrong "but thinking about it isn't". They can't help not being able to comprehend what is not put in their hands. If they are not spoon fed it is not food for thought. It was people like you who were burnt as witches than proven to be correct by science years later.

Has anyone noticed the world isn't as flat as it used to be?

hehe nicely put biscuits....

your all trippers.

Yes......'trippers'
??

There is one answer to every question.
And that answer is there are an infinte amount of answers for one each question.

........hmnnn........?

I was thinking you were wrong about the infinite answers thing, taking the scenario that 1 + 1 = 2

Whereupon you could say that 1 + 1 = 3-1 but in the end it all equals 2 anyway.

So while there may be an infinite ammount of answers, there would probably be a finite final solution.

answer = final solution..........

1+1 =2, because of mathematics but is mathematics necessarily the answer to 1+1...in it's current context, yes it is, but fundamentally not necessarily. Think of ancient civilizations in their day, 1+1 =2 might well mean they angered the gods or perhaps pleased them..just because mathematics is our current 'faith' is it true? right or wrong? can you see in the long future been called heathens for our 'mathematics' they proved it was faulse or couldn't prove it was real so they found a more productive means for their 'faith'. History has the habbit of not been history at all but just been tomorrow fundamentally i believe everything that happens in history will happen in the future so will our current 'faith' not be discarded for a new one?
So i believe we're never right or wrong, there for, there's no such thing as an answer written in stone and like an analog signal it has an infinite amount of values never ending.

Not everything is infinite.

It could be possible that infinity doesn't exist.

LOL, ok you guys have totally lost the plot now......
hehe

There's a plot now? :D

Good point.....

i must say you guys have some very interesting thoughts and theories. what website did u copy that off illhandle eh? ehehe.
anyways, i have some questions that need answering:

*why do we drive on parkways and park on driveways?

*why do fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing?

*Why are there flotation devices under plane seats instead of
parachutes?

*Why are cigarettes sold in gas stations when smoking is prohibited
there?

*If you can't drink and drive, why do you need a driver's license to
buy liquor, and why do bars have parking lots?

*How does the guy who drives the snowplow get to work in the mornings?

*If nothing ever sticks to TEFLON, how do they make TEFLON stick to the pan?

*If you tied buttered toast to the back of a cat and dropped it from a height, what would happen?

*If you're in a vehicle going the speed of light, what happens when you turn on the headlights?

*Why do they put Braille dots on the keypad of the drive-up ATM?

Ponder these my young (i assume) einsteins, platos, socrates' and aristotles. i have more questoins i need answering, if u want to hear them reply to this post

Go CHARLIE HORSE GO!

Errr, it was not copied from anywhere, i have piles of that crap scattered all over my documents in word files.....If you don't understand it, doesn't mean its l33t........LOL

Ok......now which 'joke' style website did you pull that common rubbish from hehe?

We drive on parkways, because that's what they are there for, and we park on driveways because that's what they were designed for. They mean the same thing because they are the same expression, simply with reversible adjectives. The devices are under plane seats because there is a greater chance they will be used in a water 'crash' or landing as opposed to parachutes which are ment to be lifesavers in the first place. You need a driver's licence to verify age...Bars have parking lots so people can drive to them....
The guy walks to his plow.....Teflon stick because it is a slippery substance that adheres to their surfaces once manufacturers sandblast them to roughen them, apply a primer, and embed the Teflon into the primer.....Cats can only land on four legs at a height generally greater than 2.5 metres, so a height needs to be specified....When you turn on the headlights the light will not be projected infront of you, merely scattered around the vehicle or 'refracted' in a different angle...AND the last one i really can't be bothered...

bravo, bravo, very impressive. i applaud you. you really did shut me up :D
oh, and the cat thing, the height must be greater than 7 stories. any point lower than that, the cat's brain is too slow to register what is happening and will not turn around to land on it's feet and will either be very sore or quite deceased the next day, depending on the height it was dropped from.

oh, and i do understand it. i do not see anywhere where i implied i did not

About the car traveling at the speed of light and then turning on its headlights.

First of all, nothing can travel at the speed of light except light itself, Because if you travel at the speed of light you have infinite mass. It is possibile to travel near the speed of light though, say 99.999%. As you apporch this speed though your length contracts in size and time runs slower. Now If a car was going to turn on its headlights while the car was going at the speed of light then the lights would not be visable relative to the person in the car.

How do we know that is true? No experiemt has been done to prove such a thing, it is just a theory...based on mathematics...this equation i think..

E=mc^2

what's the difference between 2 and 3?

Isn't there infinite numbers between these two numbers? So shouldn't the difference be infinite?

now im just gettin all confused hehehe. :D. isnt it funny that the thread entitled "just a useless thought" is turning out to be the most popular? shows how curious we all are. i'll bet illhandle is some scientist dude performing tests on human behaviour and has been monitoring us this whole time....:D jk.

your right it hasnt been proven, it was coupled with one of Einsteins thought Experiements. And I doubt it will ever be proven, well maybe in another millenia or two.

E=mc^2 has nothing to do with light speed etc, it's simply a method to calculate energy lost in relation to mass lost when you multiplying the mass lost by the speed of light (3 x 10^8).....
And yes i'm glad people are also adding their own thoughtful ideas on the forum......

There is a finite amount of digits between 2 and 3....that's why its discontinous as opposed to continous.....(normal distributions etc...)

The toast and cat thing- if you drop it from a great height, the cat'll land on it's feet. It's heavier than a bit of toast.

ah but u see mr cookie monster, i mean vengeance :D, the toast is strapped to the cat as it says in the question so their weights are joined to be one item. it makes no difference if the cat is heavier or not because the fact remains that the toast becomes part of the cat's weight in total.

LOL

Has anyone noticed the world isn't as flat as it used to be?

AFAIK, the ancient Greeks knew the world was spherical. Even the Bible refers to the earth as a sphere in the Hebrew Old Testament. It probably just became less popular during the middle ages when everyone got dumb. :-)

Not everything is infinite.

It could be possible that infinity doesn't exist.

I love the idea that our current mathematical theories are "the new ghosts". ie We believe in the existance of infinity, random numbers, impossible numbers, negative numbers, infantessimals, etc, because they can be proved on paper. Then they're just accepted, but it's a little harder to see where they fit into real life. Mystery is a great embarrassment to the modern mind. I haven't decided where I stand on this issue!

I do think the universe is probably a Hypercube though.

*Why do they put Braille dots on the keypad of the drive-up ATM?

I'll give this one a shot. Standardised industrial/commercial components? They use the same buttons in elevators.

speaking of things not being proven, you do all realise that pretty much nothing to do with atoms is proven because man is yet to invent anything that can magnify enough to see a single atom.

ah but u see mr cookie monster, i mean vengeance :D, the toast is strapped to the cat as it says in the question so their weights are joined to be one item. it makes no difference if the cat is heavier or not because the fact remains that the toast becomes part of the cat's weight in total.

hrmmm, what if you butter the toast?

1. cloned sheep, the question was:
"if you strap buttered toast to the back of a cat and drop it from a height will it land on its feet?"
u see the word BUTTERED somewhere in there? i know i do!

2. DrFrag, what does AFAIK mean? and good theory on the braille dots :)

Dude they have been able to split an atom, they know they exist trust me.

LOL sheepy.....I think Rutherford's famous alpha particle through gold foil experiment would 'PROVE' alot about atoms....
:)

AFAIK = As Far As I Know

And something you all have overlooked..... The answer is 42.

lol

Sorry, coudn't help myself.

It's a shame my useless thought culminated in a even more useless thought
LOL

i dunno all these theories and experiments u speak of, i am nought but a lowly public high school student

As am I.......

With some simple maths it can be proven that 1+1 infanct can equal 1

take
a²-a² = a²-a²
factorize on left by comment factor
and on right by difference of squares

a(a-a) = (a-a)(a+a)
since (a-a) is on both sides it can be canceled
therefore
a = (a+a)

let a =1
1 = 1 + 1
let a = anythign for that matter :p
just my 2.00001 cents worth

That looks right to me.....?

But that really doesn't have any significance, nor prove anything. As you can make any number = itself
E.g. simply sub in 100 or 8 or whatever........
?????
I guess that's your 1.9999cents
:)

You need to sub in a number at the start!!!
GEZUZ That's what maths deals with numbers!!
Subbing in a number after factorisation is pointless!!
Sorry, that just annoyed me....

i like cheese

multi-universal organism

err do u know wat a universe is? there can ony be 1

How do you know that??
WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?

How do you know there is nothing beyond the constantly expanding realms of darkness?
Can you prove that nothing exists outside that darkness?

Can you prove that nothing exists outside that darkness?

can you prove it does? im not saying stuff dosent exist out there, and i id like to think stuff does.

No i can't prove it, but i can have faith in it....And that is proof enough for me!
If you can't understand that sheepy, please don't post on here anymore, as what i stated above pertains to why i started this forum in the first place....

Mr. Shrimp: In reply to the cat and toast thing again, why the hell doesn't someone just do it and put an end to all the speculation?

Speculation???!!!!
Tying a piece of toast to a cat and dropping the cat has nothing to do with the toast which has no influence on gravity.....
It's just the damn cat which can turn its body in mid-air.......
Nothing else....

Yeah, well that's what I thought, but he disagreed.

How do you know that??
WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?

my proof is in the dictionary u tard.

universe: everything in existence

you dont seem very well informed so i advive u just shut up

How do you know there is nothing beyond the constantly expanding realms of darkness?
Can you prove that nothing exists outside that darkness?

if there is something beyond that, its still part of the universe dumb s***

Speculation???!!!!
Tying a piece of toast to a cat and dropping the cat has nothing to do with the toast which has no influence on gravity.....
It's just the damn cat which can turn its body in mid-air.......
Nothing else....

are you sure... my nextdoor neighbour has a cat and i have a toaster

tox = uneducated.....
Dictionary meanings are what humanity has created you utter moron....
THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE THE TRUTH!
We as a race can speculate all we want, but many of those speculations cannot be proven as yet or ever.....
What if everything in existence is not as we think it is?
What if alll matter and energy, including the earth, the galaxies, and the contents of intergalactic space, regarded as a whole, a universe.....
What if there is more outside this Singular Universe....You can't prove that 'MORON'

and tox, stop reading out of the dictionary and get an education.....
It actually does help :)

What are you talking about sheep......

Your the kind of uneducated idiot who takes people 'useless thoughts' literally because you have none.
Try and think for yourself, you may actually get a job or something....

i been thinking about this cat business... what happens if you strap a cat and another cat back to back? do they spin around and around in a cat spiral? or would one overpower the other and stay on the bottom, landing on its feet and having its back broken by the other cat?

My guess is they would both try equally hard, eventually both would hit the ground sideways....
lol

If our thoughts were restricted by the dictionary we would hardly think at all. Lanuage evolves very fast and covers a great deal but still it is very hard to use language to express ones thoughts and even still the meaning often comes out diluted.

Thankyou infant eater, for proving my point :)

No offence, that is your nickname, infanteater, who eats infants?
Wow that's sick!
hehe

Cookie Vengeance, when i replied to your previous post, i was merely saying that the statement you made about the cat being heavier than a piece of toast was irrelevant, not that you were wrong about the cat. and sheepy, the two cats thing... gold. :D

You know what?
I am not going to click that.

I will NEVER f***ing click that. I just don't want to see what's there. It has something to do with eating infants...and it's a picture.

Ugh.

Oh, what the hell.
*clicks that*

WHAT THE f***?!?!

Ok i did not just see a picture of a small child being eaten......
Yeh i know its fake
lol

lol, i also hope that it is fake

It's not.

don't post disgusting pictures or links to same on this forum or you will cop a smiting!

Thanks trog, and yes it is fake....IT HAS TO BE!!

cloned sheep can you send that link to my email please

fild0@hotmail.com

:)

After reading through this post i have only one comment to make and that is about the cat strapped to the buttered toast.

The question is designed to have no answer, there is two theroys cats always fall on there legs and toast always lands buttered side down. Hence if both theroys were to be correct neither the cat or toast could land on the ground.

however the cat theory seems to be more correct to me and depending on the height that they jumped i think that the cat would land first.

the toast theory only work if you knok your toast of a table or something of a similar hight because it only has time to make a 180 flip if you droped it from a hight of 2 times a table something like a frige it will land the right way up.
but a cat lands on it feet because of its points of gravety on the lower side of its body there for when it flips to the bottom side it stays there because it is hevier

goof are you some sort of sick, twisted, desperate, low, psychotic freak of nature?

thankyou sitting duck for tellling the people :) . i assume many people did not get it because they were always refering to the cat and never had anything to say about the buttered toast. and people, my post with all those questions, they were just jokes, nothing more. i was very suprised that anyone took them further :D

Mr Shrimp:
Ponder these my young (i assume) einsteins, platos, socrates' and aristotles. i have more questoins i need answering, if u want

Err.....yes shrimp i'm sure you ment those questions to be 'jokes'', especially when you praised me for answering basically of them too, as you also stated you 'wanted to know the answers'
LOL stop contradicting yourself!
hehe

The answer is, the cat would land on the ground and the toast would have no bearing on wether the cat would or would with its feet on the ground (depending on the height).

By the way, anyone heard the badger song??
Oh badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger, mushroom mushroom, badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger, mushroom mushroom........

ILL_HANDLE#3:
Ok......now which 'joke' style website did you pull that common rubbish from hehe?

seems im not the only one contradicting myself

Lol you moron! hehe
I said that as an 'amusing' comeback to when you ridiculed my own thoughtful ideas as being 'copied' from a website (which i know was pure jealousy now). You don't understand the meaning of the word 'contradict'......The 'truth' is, you probably did pulll that rubbish from some website.....and you made that rubbish out to be your own words, which you wanted the ANSWERS to....Which i helped with!! You requested us to ponder the questions as you wanted to know the answers!! LOL stop contradicting yourself again!

ILL_HANDLE#3:

so are u saying that there is more than everything in existence?

what dont u understand - everything in existence includes EVERYTHING, EVEN IF WE DONT KNOW ABOUT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT EXIST

so read a book or something dumbass

eheheh told.

Once again, dictionary meanings are useless in this forum, hence 'useless thoughts' as the topic YOU TOTAL UNEDUCATED MORON. Stop trying to prove people wrong and use your own imagination to develop your own IDEAS.....How do you know things even exist?? What if they don't even exist as an entity? You can't prove that, as you can't prove why humanity exists in the first place.....Existentualism is a key issue in this topic, unfortunately, you are clearly uneducated (hence you consult the dictionary for everything). In other words, how about you read a book entitled 'Why i can't think for myself, because i was brought up to believe in what society placed before me'........Get a job and get a life

You must be the most pompous arsed freckpuncher to ever grace the Ausgamers forum.Pretending to be intelligent & condescending all in one toss.I would'nt normally criticize any forumer but you have been having the biggest spit,wank,spray or whatever on different posts over the past.Get your hand off it handler.!

ILL_HANDLE#3, yes i know that was a comeback to my statement of you copying your thing from a website but in itself it states that you thought those questions were jokes.

and also, since you said "i have tonnes of that crap lying around in documents", it is very likely that you did not write that and that it was copied from a website down the line.

i'd also like to say that i agree with arnie and also that you have broken 2 forum rules. sure, other people in this post have broken a rule but how could they not criticise you when your head is obviously bigger than an elephants butt-cheeks.

why dont you post something relative

Defending my own words of thought is not pompous or whatever. If you guys don't have the confidence nor intelligence to recognise that, then well, it shows....And arnie, you clearly have no people skills whatsoever, did you get bullied in first grade??
Sorry if i brought back any reminders....

Lol how can you pretend to be intelligent
HAHA, that's just moronic....Just becaause you can't string a properly worded sentence together arnie...

but defending them in a way that you appear vain and boastful is. and if i were you i wouldnt be criticizing other people 'bout people skills

What?? Can you please convert that post into a coherent, piece of prose which i can decipher?

1. if you actually knew what pompous meant, you would KNOW what i'm talking about. i suggest you look it up in the DICTIONARY!

2. In reply to this post:

Once again, dictionary meanings are useless in this forum, hence 'useless thoughts' as the topic YOU TOTAL UNEDUCATED MORON. Stop trying to prove people wrong and use your own imagination to develop your own IDEAS.....How do you know things even exist?? What if they don't even exist as an entity? You can't prove that, as you can't prove why humanity exists in the first place.....Existentualism is a key issue in this topic, unfortunately, you are clearly uneducated (hence you consult the dictionary for everything). In other words, how about you read a book entitled 'Why i can't think for myself, because i was brought up to believe in what society placed before me'........Get a job and get a life.

1. What has "useless thoughts" got to do with the dictionary? answer=nothing.
2. An entity can exist in thought so even if things dont exist, if you think they do, they exist as an entity.
3. Why do you feel you must verbally attack people because they think differently than you? this may be a shock to you but you are not always right.

ILL_HANDLE#3, have u ever read a science book/seen a doc. on tv/taken any science classes at high school?

cos f***ing hell, u are one misinformed dickbitch

hear hear!

CATFIGHT! Rowwwww, LOL

Actually i take physics, chemistry and biology and got A+'s for all three mid year exams, so clearly my knowledge counts for more than any of you uneducated, jobless unaspiring, try-hard forum geeks.....
I leave it at that.

I am not a try Hard.
Rowwwwww, LOL.

again, u call us geeks but:
1. u r the one who got A+'s in all those exams
2. looking under your name, it appears you have posted more than many of us

'Defending my own words of thought is not pompous or whatever. If you guys don't have the confidence nor intelligence to recognise that, then well, it shows'

What does confidence have to do with it?
And if you admitted they're useless, 'sorry for wasting your time', what was the point of this thread?

'Lol how can you pretend to be intelligent
HAHA, that's just moronic....Just becaause you can't string a properly worded sentence together arnie...'

You can't spell 'because' and have more errors in that post than I can be bothered counting. This, to me, looks incredibly hypocritical. Who agrees?

You shouldn't go lording over people because you feel more 'educated' than others because essentially the more educated you are the more close minded you are. Our education becomes too specific, dictating where our thoughts lead us. To be totally uneducated is like been a child where your imagination is almost limitless. Once you truly admit to yourself that you don't know ANYTHING then you can open your mind to knowledge. Unfortunalely I haven't been able to convince myself I don't know anything yet...

My cat eats cat food

Also I hope we all live in the first Quantum computer built by intelligent beings other than ourselves for the purpose of being arguementative on intellectual fronts for the humour of the intelligent race which built the first computer that our world and universe reside in because.

My cat eats cat food.


Stop Bitchin' Start Thinkin'

Actually Handle I stopped reading this forum about a page ago cos of your dips*** blathering. Stop going on about dictionaries and crap. You cant even spell 'existentialism'. Your a d*******. Thank you for reading my post have a nice day.

ILL_HANDLE#3, i doubt u get A+'s in those subjects when you dont even know the dictionary meaning of universe...

Oooahh !,oooaaah!,handlers gonna be in such a tizz when he reads your posts guys.Please try to be more polite with such an educated and amiable type of being.Your still invited to the LAN next week ill baby.

Hey ILL_HANDLE#3, can't wait to hear your next theory after you watch The Matrix for the billionth time. It should be a ripper judging by your first effort.

What if earth was indeed a building block for producing coke bottle glasses on which the sight of geeks was dependant? What IF ... indeed. Thus in essence, hey hey.

What if this thread was indeed a building block in handler's ongoingly futile quest for respect?

'Actually i take physics, chemistry and biology and got A+'s for all three mid year exams, so clearly my knowledge counts for more than any of you uneducated, jobless unaspiring, try-hard forum geeks.....'

I've said it before and I'll say it again.

You're the biggest f***ing hypocrit in the world.

I am a hypocrite, and i post useless and often retarded thoughts on forums.

Its not my fault that people like to post back saying, `omg that was so deep` when i was talking about some crap like dirt or something.

Blame everyone else for wanting to look as though they are smart by agreeing with something someone else says in an attempt to look smart, by saying something thats easily interpreted in more than one way, on a subject that is inconclusive.

Its never the leaders fault, its always the damn followers... being brain washed into doing the leaders bidding.

ooooooooookkkkkkkkkkkk............. please provide proof that that was really you i'll handle. i hate when peeps change names and dont tell you if it really them, or for that matter, when people pretend to be someone else.

What cracks me up about Ill Handler is that we're all forum geeks yet maybe a month or two back when he was trying to bring me down to his level all of his posts were at times when the average person would be going out with his friends (1 post at 11:40pm on a Friday night and another at 10pm on a Saturday night) and getting s***faced/laid etc. I've come to the conclusion that he has no friends and his posts are his only source of attention.

ok Im home but Im workin tommorow. Yeah I reckon thats got to be Handler.(one)
Like tox said one misinformed dickbitch LOL

Oh yeah and I want to keep this Handler bashing thread alive.

Eh, are you saying im someone im not =P

I was just saying that you cant just attack people for stupid posts, in a round-about non-straight-to-the-point kinda way.

oakee doakee then. i do believe the portion of my brain that i am using has almost collapsed. so you're not ill_handle, or are you? tell the truth now boy-o :D

I am One.

I needed a name, so i chose that one... i am a 17 year old un-educated almost out of school boy.

I dont think i am smarter than anyone, and think everyones entitled to their opinion. I dont like people that think that they are smarter than everyone, and think that they are always right.

well thats good. thanks for clearing that up. its just you talk like "HE" does :)

Maybe he just wants to be more like me, everyone needs to aspire to something.

Unless he is just a kid looking for acceptance from his peers over the Internet.

He still hasn't answered the question as to whether hes Handler or not.

If you are talking about me, then no. I am not.

I'd have thought that was obvious.

In fact I did think that was obvious.

Nidz: your right.. it is pretty stupid and you are wasting our time reading this trash.. I get enough spam in my mailbox as it is.. now it's on posts..
-= I represent P.E.T.A -(People for the Eating of Tasty Animals) =-
___________________________

If this isa waste of your time then WHY THE f*** DD YOU BOTHER READINGIT YOU f***ING IDIOT. IT CLEARLY WARNED YOU!!!!

Well I dont know if anyone has already posted this or not and I dont care if I'm 100 time dumber than Steven Hawking. But what 1+1 does not infact =2. The only reason people think 1+1=2 is because we came up with this metogd of counting. Therorectically 1+1=2 but just because someone invented maths. Indeed what if 1 doesnt equal 1 just because is says one it could actually eqaul 3 or something theorectilcally stupid or polictilcoly incorrect. For all we know the earth could be a single cell in a giants body or a alients body and the solar system is just a vein so big to us we think we think we are superior.

Stop this madness at once! I'm sorry I replied to this thread way back in the early days. Now look what it's become!

In Reply to EVVILASDEATH:
Quote:

"With some simple maths it can be proven that 1+1 infanct can equal 1

take
a²-a² = a²-a²
factorize on left by comment factor
and on right by difference of squares

a(a-a) = (a-a)(a+a)
since (a-a) is on both sides it can be canceled
therefore
a = (a+a)

let a =1
1 = 1 + 1
let a = anythign for that matter :p
just my 2.00001 cents worth "

Actually, you don't have to sub anything in to prove that your 1=1+1 doesnt hold.



a²-a² = a²-a²
factorize on left by comment factor
and on right by difference of squares

a(a-a) = (a-a)(a+a)
Since (a-a) ALWAYS = 0,

a(0)=(0)(a+a)

Therefore 0=0, equation is still true, but useless.

In any math equation, when you are cancelling out terms you have to make sure that they are not either 0 or INFINITY (eg.something/0 or tangent 90 degrees).

All those who give a s*** raise your hand.