Yay Nadal is getting his arsed kicked in style. Hopefully he gets pwned in 3 sets.

He loses

u r a c***

speedy gonzalez will take the match

screw this match
im hanging for federer vs A-rod

then i would like to see A-rod vs maria in the bedroom

man gonzalez and nadal are hammering the s*** out of each other

lol
reso rulez

sif

Who the f*** watches people hitting a ball back an forth over a net, while grunting?

Who the f*** watches people hitting a ball back an forth over a net, while grunting?

People that appreciate talent and entertianment!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v683/shorty323/397xp.jpg

I watch it sometimes

tennis a true game of individual physical talent and psychological tenacity

like retirement homes!

Tennis requiring talent? How the f*** is it entertaining? Drifting, now there's a sport that requires skill and is entertaining.

Anyone liking the players being able to check a call with that hawk eye technology or wtva it is? I reckon either have it calling the whole game or don't have it at all.

at least now I know what Sharapova sounds like in the sack.

ffs hawt chick but the grunting is fkn annoying++

annoying on the court, but i'd allow it in the darkness.

infi knows the score

protius is a f***ing idiot

protius is a f***ing idiot

qft

protius is a f***ing idiot



qft

go federer

qft

qft

reso you jerk post a spoiler warning next time... asif ruin sports results.

protius is a f***ing idiot

totally

Can't wait to watch Federererer and A-Rod play tonight

gah, a-rod got smashed

federer truly is a tennis terminator

poor kimmy got done also, she was playing some awesome tennis

<3 federer

only reason i'll watch tennis is to watch the fed-express

straight sets ftw

Federer looks like Kat ?

federer is a f***ing freak. gonzalez did very well though.

im kinda tired of seeing him win all the time

he's the only reason i watch tennis at all

he's the best, probably ever

He needs to do the Grand Slam before we call him the best ever.

very true about federer, hes good, but only time will tell if hes truly awesome

i have not seen such tennis ownage, since the last time i picked up the sticks to play some topspin on the xbox

last edited by Spook at 15:48:10 29/Jan/07

very true about federer, hes good, but only time will tell if hes truly awesome

What, more than winning 10 grand slams? How many does he have to win before he's awesome?

He's the best tennis player I've ever watched by miles. Also, he's not a complete f***ing tool like many other tennis players so he gets mad propz

He's the best tennis player I've ever watched by miles

well, its settled then!

10 Grand Slams at 25 years old points towards him being about as awesome as they get.

The all important stats:

http://www.tennis28.com/studies/Federer_Sampras.html

and

http://federermagic.blogspot.com/2005/07/roger-federer-vs-pete-sampras.html

Would seem that Federer has some way to go to match Peter and I don't doubt he'll get there reaaaal soon, he seems to be catching up pretty quickly

2001 Wimbledon R16
Federer d. Sampras
7-6(7) 5-7 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5

the only time they played Roger won.

Yeah but by then Sampras was waaaaay passed his peak. Not saying he couldn't beat him but it's stats and it doesn't really tell the whole story.

Look, all I know is, Federer is the best tennis player alive - nay, the best person alive.

Also, he's not a complete f***ing tool like many other tennis players so he gets mad propz

absolutely

hewitt you f***ing tool

Warnie > Federer

who is the greatest, who is the best of all time?

the fed-express

Rod Laver atm.

Federer needs at least a career grand slam (a win at roland garros) to even be considered better. Rod Laver did the grand slam twice in his career.

isnt it called a calendar grand slam?

last edited by ravn0s at 21:19:48 30/Jan/07

i'm pretty sure rod laver is happy he's not playing in federer's time, i think he's even been quoted as saying that?

pave thats a pretty n00b thing to say.

tennis then is played so different to tennis now.

there was like 0 top spin in games back then. now its like a key to so many shots.

balls were hit alot slower due to s***tier raquets (i think) and all sorts of s*** like that.

u can't really compare the 2 and say "if they could play each other who would win"

u can really only compare them on their level of sucess.

well no not really cause rod laver himself has said that, and i bet he hasn't said that about too many people

and everyone is talking about him being the best ever

samprass would beat him

nahhhh not even bro

sup

Rod Laver saying that he is glad that he never played during Federer's time is purely lip service (keke) and nothing more.

Deep down he believes that in his prime, he'd smash fed all over the court (although that may not be necessarily true)

How about we watch an animated computer footage of the two playing each other and see who'd win and then stage a real hyped up exhibition match to publicise it and make moolah from it.

Much like in the new Rocky Balboa movie.

I believe that's what spidz was getting at

2001 Wimbledon R16
Federer d. Sampras
7-6(7) 5-7 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5



the only time they played Roger won.

then

samprass would beat him

Deep down he believes that in his prime, he'd smash fed all over the court (although that may not be necessarily true)

haha

doesn't rod laver make special effort to watch federer play in finals and s***?

he lives in america now, whats the go with that too

I believe that's what spidz was getting at

oh right, but didn't quite get at it being so vague.