|
![]() |
|
| Author |
|
|||||||
|
mongie
Posts: 6662
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Anyone have any suggestions for programs to monitor the speed of LAN connections?
e.g. data transfer speed? Thanks! |
|||||||
| #0 02:41pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
system
|
--
|
|||||||
| #0 |
|
|||||||
|
Freewheelin
Posts: 1520
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
windows 7
|
|||||||
| #1 02:44pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
Crusher
Posts: 357
Location: Newcastle, New South Wales
|
task manager network stats?
performance monitor? wireshark? |
|||||||
| #2 02:48pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
mongie
Posts: 6663
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
is perfmon accurate?
|
|||||||
| #3 02:51pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
Eds
Posts: 9074
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
DU Meter
|
|||||||
| #4 02:51pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
mongie
Posts: 6664
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I was trying to remember what it was called Eds :D
Thanks! |
|||||||
| #5 03:46pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
Spook
Posts: 26243
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
linux iso + stopwatch
|
|||||||
| #6 04:37pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
ara
Posts: 2809
Location: Sydney, New South Wales
|
networktraffic gadget > du meter |
|||||||
| #7 04:51pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
mongie
Posts: 6665
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Thanks everyone.
Now to figure out why my gigabit connected notebooks are transfering at ~ 13MB/s |
|||||||
| #8 05:29pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
ara
Posts: 2813
Location: Sydney, New South Wales
|
nvidia nic chipset? |
|||||||
| #9 05:29pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 10328
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Now to figure out why my gigabit connected notebooks are transfering at ~ 13MB/ssounds like a fair figure for a slowish disk |
|||||||
| #10 06:46pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
tequila
Posts: 3228
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
^ 4200rpm drives?
|
|||||||
| #11 07:12pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 10330
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
well I'm not referring solely to the rpm of the disk, you can work that out surely!
|
|||||||
| #12 07:17pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
whoop
Posts: 14558
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
||||||||
| #13 08:22pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
E.T.
Posts: 2087
Location: Queensland
|
can any of these report which computer on the network is generating traffic and when?
|
|||||||
| #14 09:05pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
Eds
Posts: 9075
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
If you mean for interwebs you would have too have something between the net and your network to monitor all traffic, like a proxy or something to that effect.
Or if you want to look at what is taking up traffic on a PC per application there is a free monitoring tool from http://www.netlimiter.com/ for windows |
|||||||
| #15 09:32pm 17/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
mongie
Posts: 6666
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
This is between two Lenovo notebooks with Intel nic's
HDD's are 7200rpm, but they're not super fast... One of our desktop guys thinks its to do with dodgy WinXP drivers, or fixed MTU's in windows xp. :( Migrating gigs of data at 10MB/s makes me sad in the pants. |
|||||||
| #16 08:15am 18/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 10334
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
not sure what he means by fixed mtu, maybe he meant tcp window size? but the mtu should be set to 1500 by default, and I can tell you - you can basically max out gbit between two windows xp machines while their mtu is 1500
it shouldn't be too hard to diagnose what the bottleneck is though, by benchmarking local disk speed to remove network from the equation, and using something like iperf (if there's a windows equiv) to test network speed without disk factor |
|||||||
| #17 08:44am 18/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
d[o_0]b
Posts: 3257
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
where would be the fun in that when you can just come here and be a whiney c***
|
|||||||
| #18 09:30am 18/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
mongie
Posts: 6667
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I've learned a bit more about the situation today :(
Can't use jumbo frames beacuse the stupid intel NICs in our donor machines don't support it when PCI-E power management is enabled (wtf) due to some bug. So, thats out of the question. iperf is pretty much maxing out at 95Mbit no matter what I do with the drivers. (A bit of background, we're migrating from lenovo T60's to T400's and trying to improve the data copy speed through our USMT scripting) |
|||||||
| #19 09:34am 18/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
mongie
Posts: 6668
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
PS: I'm retarded. One laptop had negotiated 100mbps.
NO WONDER I'M STUCK AT 95MBIT |
|||||||
| #20 09:47am 18/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
tequila
Posts: 3233
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
thats pretty special
|
|||||||
| #21 09:56am 18/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
mongie
Posts: 6669
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
well, thats today... its still only hitting 500mbit in iperf. Thats not exactly SPEEDY.
AFAIK Jim, iperf isn't dependent on HDD, so it shouldn't be a limiting factor. |
|||||||
| #22 09:59am 18/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 10337
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Can't use jumbo frames beacuse the stupid intel NICs in our donor machines don't support it when PCI-E power management is enabled (wtf) due to some bug.as I mentioned you shouldn't really need to use jumbo frames just to get close to gbit speed copying between two xp machines - I've tested this myself lots of times, plus if you're not using a crossover cable you need to enable jumbo frames on every node between the machines as well (all switches in the path) AFAIK Jim, iperf isn't dependent on HDD, so it shouldn't be a limiting factor.that's why I suggested it :) I was saying to test your disk speed and network speed independently so one couldn't affect the other |
|||||||
| #23 11:14am 18/09/09 |
|
|||||||
|
system
|
--
|
|||||||
| #23 |
|
|||||||
|
| ||||||||