Boing.

They are some pretty awful looking boobs dude!

Argh... can't judge cos I'm at work.
*sigh*

awsome...bouncing boobies!!! oh also for those at work NSFW for sure

haha thats cool.

They are some pretty awful looking boobs dude!

...and do you have a point of comparison? oops

...and do you have a point of comparison? oops

This is the internet. If I couldn't find a point of comparison you should all be very worried

ah yes, this game...very entertaining

They are some pretty awful looking boobs dude!

Speak for yourself Kat you slut.

what's the obsession with bouncing breasts? better yet, what's with the obsession with breasts at all? yes, they're what will feed your children to help them grow one day ... and yes they represent the female form to a degree, so what?


damn kids

Speak for yourself Kat you slut.

If they were real boobs I can understand your desire to stand up for her, but considering she is CG I am a tad baffled.

If they were real boobs I can understand your desire to stand up for her, but considering she is CG I am a tad baffled.

It's probably the closest he's been to a woman in years.

sheesh. animated boobs. try some some real ones ffs.

Hahah .. there goes my afternoon.

Those ffg's look like they're about to rip right off. Seems like they're trying a little too hard to make a sale.

what's the obsession with bouncing breasts? better yet, what's with the obsession with breasts at all? yes, they're what will feed your children to help them grow one day ... and yes they represent the female form to a degree, so what?


damn kids

you sir are a Fag!

I have to say I agree with Kat on this one in that they are pretty shabby boobies indeed!

Here's a better selection.

Grow up Tufnut,

Boobs aren't everything.

Respect goes to dice. You're a champ buddy.

^ I think we found dice's life partner.

Boobs aren't everything but they sure are nice

^ Agreed.

hahahahahahaha

not all of us have to make out we have an unquenchable thirst for some lumps of skin to prove our sexuality, wishehwastuff

i hear shemales have some great ones, guess you find them irresistible too? i'm sure someone on here has manlissa's number, try tanaka

Before my time there dice...before my time.
It's nice to see you're willing to experiment though , normal guys not doing it for you anymore eh?

last edited by Tanaka Khan at 16:54:02 09/Mar/06

infi: hahahahaha there goes my week! I'm easily amused when it comes to breats.

Boobs have many uses, they look best when you can lay down a nice four roper over them :)

Kat the point I was making is that your a dirty whore.

TK, your a f***in idiot. Closest I've got to a woman, haha. Ah geeze.

Ditch...... you know where it's at
Well said

Kat the point I was making is that your a dirty whore.

Stinky has thousands of nude photographs on the net, does that make him a dirty whore?

TK, your a f***in idiot. Closest I've got to a woman, haha. Ah geeze.

you're not 'your', idiot

i hear shemales have some great ones

o rly?

Ditch...... you know where it's at

Well by the looks of it we know where he's putting it too, does dice know you're cheating on him?



Who would have known Boobs could cause so much trouble....

yeah the thing about that ... bzpro and i love tubes made by waves, you on the other hand are obsessed with dude tube.

Hmm, when you're the one who doesn't like boobs I fail to see how that comment affects me?

It's all in fun mate =)

hahahaha.

thread delivers

it's not that i don't like them, just i think there are much more attractive things about females ... like the way they think/act/talk, and a girl's face + hips/butt = win

Seen here
Here
And here

the last pic i put up because i wanted to do this with it:
<3

dice: there is more to a woman than just her boobs, I don't think anyone would disagree with that. Well, I would hope they wouldn't

it's not that i don't like them, just i think there are much more attractive things about females ... like the way they think/act/talk, and a girl's face + hips/butt = win

So you go for other bulging body parts, just without the nipple ? Do nipples turn you off ?

nipples don't turn me off

bulging bodyparts ... that i am meant to be attracted to so i actually want to 'mount' the female (let's keep this scientific), what would i be doing with breasts apart from maybe pleasing her through foreplay?

What else do you do with the boobies, play tennis ?
EDIT: s/butt/boobies/

Results 1 - 10 of about 3,100,000 for tit f***ing.
Results 1 - 10 of about 4,300,000 for butt f***ing.

Ok, you're right. You can't do as much with the boobies.


EDIT2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammary_intercourse hahaha

last edited by eXemplar at 22:04:38 09/Mar/06

what would i be doing with breasts apart from maybe pleasing her through foreplay?

HAHAHAHAHA you've got a lot to learn sir!

foreplay indeed *scoff*

as said a second ago, the attraction is there so i 'feel' like i want to 'mount' her, i now ask you to give a scientific reason as to why the human consciousness would have evolved to be so attracted to breasts ... even more so than butt (curvey hips)/face etc

what would i be doing with breasts apart from maybe pleasing her through foreplay?

I am shocked; utterly shocked.

Surely you can think of something else to use them for.... for your benefit

edit: Aren't men suppose to find boobs and bums/hips attractive because the bigger the boobs the more babies she can feed and the bigger the hips the more babies she can safely have?

last edited by Kat at 22:00:44 09/Mar/06

Breasts are attractive because that is one of the things that make women not men.

Breasts are attractive because that is one of the things that make women not men.

Have you looked outside lately dude?????

as said a second ago, the attraction is there so i 'feel' like i want to 'mount' her, i now ask you to give a scientific reason as to why the human consciousness would have evolved to be so attracted to breasts ... even more so than butt (curvey hips)/face etc

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast NWS booby pics

It is commonly assumed by biologists that the real evolutionary purpose of women having breasts is to attract the male of the species; that, in other words, breasts are a sexually dimorphic, or secondary sex characteristics. One theory is based around the fact that, unlike nearly all other primates, human females do not display clear, physical signs of ovulation. This could have plausibly resulted in human males evolving to respond to more subtle signs of ovulation. During ovulation, the increased estrogen present in the female body results in a slight swelling of the breasts, which then males could have evolved to find attractive. In response, there would be evolutionary pressures that would favor females with more swollen breasts who would, in a manner of speaking, appear to males to be the most likely to be ovulating.

i now ask you to give a scientific reason as to why the human consciousness would have evolved to be so attracted to breasts

I can't give you scientific data to back this up, but my opinion is this attraction is imprinted upon us at an early age (breast feeding), although my thoughts do crumble when it comes to women not being attracted to them (like us males are). And personally I prefer smaller breasts, nothing TOO big and saggy.

Have you looked outside lately dude?????

what

The amount of guys who have boobs.

manboods dontequalsign tits.

that theory is pretty shallow ... gg wiki. i'd be more inclined to say it would be closer to the concept that the bigger the breasts, the more children they can feed ... but seriously, how many children could you possibly want? and how many could she possibly have at once? normal is single baby, rarer is twins, rarer still is triplets, so being attracted to bigger breasts seems just a tad redundant to me

and these days, with fake breasts and all, the idea that these things are what seperate females from males is ludicrous, however, the subconscious/genetic emotional trigger system is a tad delayed when it comes to evolving, so i'd agree with that reasoning as well - there are a lot of things about females that seperate them from males which cause the males to be attracted to them, and vice versa of course

in short: apart from them being novelty items when they get larger, because you wouldn't need that much milk to feed one baby (and the breasts swell up to 1.5 pounds heavier so they do have enough milk), then there's no real reason you'd want a girl with bigger breasts.

I have nipples, can you milk me?

Duder, it's not about how-many-babies-at-once, it's an instinct thing. Propogation, survival etc.

One does not simply outgrow such ingrained instincts.

Hrmmmm, so why has the number of females that get breast augmentation/enlargment increased so much over the last 5 or so years?

Dem some crazy bitches EH?!
Sif fly overseas just to get implants, am I right? <_<

Fark. Mine better not go swelling like that.

Asking why some men are attracted to big melons/some men are inclined to look at legs/some men go for girls who have next to no body shape and thus look like boys is sort of unanswerable. It's the same reason you like mushrooms or the colour green or whatever... you just do.

Probably something rooted deep in the subconscious very early on - as suggested earlier.

Personally, I think life would be easier with a smaller bust - they get all the pretty bras without having to pay a mint for them. Wenches.

2 post too late neff.

why would the instinct be there so strongly in so many guys is my query ... it's obvious you don't NEED huge breasts, and they're more detrimental in a fair few general life cases than an advantage ... apart from showing how womanly you are and attracting the alpha male? but i would have thought a pretty face (traits in accordance to how one is wanting to grow personality wise) + good butt (good circulation and healthy muscles or whatever) + hips (good for carrying children) would have been a better go for that?

f***EN NINJA EDIT!
QQ
I seen that s***.

Asking why some men are attracted to big melons/some men are inclined to look at legs/some men go for girls who have next to no body shape and thus look like boys is sort of unanswerable. It's the same reason you like mushrooms or the colour green or whatever... you just do.

it's thoughts like these that earn you the 'idiot' title, but then, you believe in god, too, right?


just a quick reason for the above comment: everything has a reason, and yes it does relate to the subconscious. it can be related a lot to how humans are set on EVOLVING. that psychologist with only half a clue saying that we do everything for the opposite sex was almost right ... if he looked a little deeper, he would have asked "why do we do everything for the opposite sex?" and most likely would have come to the answer: "because that is how we continue our genetics and strengthen them ... the stronger we are and the better mate we seduce, the better chance our genes will have of succeeding later. why do that? i don't feel like writing an essay, but in short - need to survive / become biggest/best/most dominate = survive, nuff said

we grow up with girls with no titties and dont give a f***, then they come of age grow titties and holy f*** they arnt just girls anymore they turn into women. the woman is sexy, powerful and DANGEROUS

f*** i love danger

last edited by Fuknukle at 23:18:48 09/Mar/06

it's thoughts like these that earn you the 'idiot' title, but then, you believe in god, too, right?

Still not over that, huh?

What I was saying, is that it boils down to personal preference because otherwise everyone would have the same likings and they'd all go for the strong, attractive, busty female. Evolution aside, not everyone is chasing after that set model of characteristics in a partner.

no, but not all of us have the same genetics, and therefore we'd of course be going for different things. the answer isn't "it simply is", that answer only applies at the very root of all things for now. the answer is complex and full of reason. the sky isn't blue simply because it is. the grass isn't green simply because it is. look deeper, then i won't think of you as an idiot.

look deeper, then i won't think of you as an idiot.

Well I doubt that, what with me being from the Jesus camp and all.

the sky isn't blue simply because it is. the grass isn't green simply because it is.

Of course not - but the sky and the grass also don't run off feelings and past experiences, which run independent of any evolutionary drive that exists in us. I did, however, drastically over-simplify. My apologies.

the sky isn't blue simply because it is. the grass isn't green simply because it is. l

Well, on a deeper level, the sky is blue simply because it is, the grass is green simply because it is.

The chlorophil in the grass has a green pigment, that is particularly good colour to absorb a large range of the visile light spectrum. Why is that? Most likly because the wavelengths of the absorbed lights are just the right amount to knock electrons about. Why is that? Perhaps because the spinning photon has just the right amount of energy to do so. Why does the photon spin? Probably because of various quantum interactions. Why are there these Interactions? Probably because they are needed, exactly, for this universe to be stable? Why is the universe stable? Probably because it needs to be stable in order to exist? Why does the universe exist? Who knows, it just does, it just is.
So looking deeply, we see that the grass is indeed green, simply because it is.

Grrr, as much as I dont want to. I have to partially agree with Dice.

I suspect a good portion of why men like breasts is because of social conditioning.
Every Single Day, we see pictures of the 'ideal' human phyics. Those photochopped images of woman on billboards, magazine covers and so on. We like breasts, partially, because for almost all our life we have been told to.
Many years ago ankles were seen as highly attractive, they would elict a similar response to seeing the clevage of a woman.

I suspect there is biological mechanisms afot also, and the possible frudiean (spl?) phycological mechanisims such as the baby breast feeding and whatnot. There could even be the Jungian inbuilt Archtype of what is attractive also..
So many possible reasons.

So Kat if all you could reply to what I said was this:

you're not 'your', idiot

...clearly that means that you are still a dirty whore, and you put up FOUL pictures of yourself all over the internets, and then you say WELL I BET YOU'VE JERKED OFF TO THE PHOTOS OF ME, I BET, HAVENT YOU HUH?!?!? in your defense.

gold.

err no, the grass is green because of a lot of reasons ... you can't just go to the absolute question of existence, see that the answer is "because it is" and then apply it to everything else, because there are deeper reasons as to why things have become as they are

Of course not - but the sky and the grass also don't run off feelings and past experiences, which run independent of any evolutionary drive that exists in us. I did, however, drastically over-simplify. My apologies.

feelings are just chemical reactions inside of the brain that are triggered by certain thought/body signals, these are not independent of any evolutionary drive. even past experiences are not independent of an evolutionary drive because every decision you make is somehow in accordance with evolution - it's the reason you do anything. emotions/feelings all have their reasons for existing in the brain. they're nothing magical, they're actually easily explained.

and yes, i would stop thinking of you as an idiot, because if actually thought things through and looked beyond "it just is" for a change, you'd probably find a lot of reasons as to why the whole concept of "God" is bs.

I love lamp.

and yes, i would stop thinking of you as an idiot, because if actually thought things through and looked beyond "it just is" for a change, you'd probably find a lot of reasons as to why the whole concept of "God" is bs.

I can completely understand why the idea of God is considered BS to most. My belief in a god isn't rational or logical and frankly, given world events, really makes no sense at all. Nonetheless, it gives me comfort and, ridiculous as it may seem, the teachings of the bible make sense to me - irrespective of whether it's a literal or factual guide.

Perhaps my "evolutionary makeup" is predisposed toward a belief in something greater than myself that I can place my trust in.

I love lamp.

Their periods attract bears, the bears can smell the menstruation!

why would the instinct be there so strongly in so many guys is my query

I think that would be pointedly obvious considering it is instinct.

it's obvious you don't NEED huge breasts

Of course you don't need huge breasts. Who ever said you did ?

but i would have thought a pretty face (traits in accordance to how one is wanting to grow personality wise) + good butt (good circulation and healthy muscles or whatever) + hips (good for carrying children) would have been a better go for that?

A pretty face, good backside and large hips don't show anything in relation to the menstrual cycle, though. You're thinking too modern. Beauty is a modern concept, but I'd say you're partially right in regards to physique. Think more ancient humans though. So deeply engrained in the subconscious that's it's part of our make up, rather than the way we think.

Don't get me wrong, I like a nicely laid out gal as much as the next guy, but personally this all strikes me as a bit shallow.

EDIT: Oh god no, no religion!

last edited by eXemplar at 00:14:43 10/Mar/06

From boobs to God...QGL, you've done it again.

Now all we need is someone to suggest that smoking marijuana influences boob size and we have a royal flush.

GG team.

eXemplar, your points stand to a degree, but since when has a human male ever worried about whether the girl was in her cycle or not? i know i couldn't care less, the act of 'love making' is more about when i need it/feel like it. that's not meant to sound selfish, just, when i have children, it'll be by choice based on whether or not i and my partner are ready to support that child both mentally and physically ... but i'll maintain my mental and physical health by having sex as much as i am told by impulse that i need to

amy, going by what you just said, you are more than capable of understanding what life really is, but you have been brought up to simply accept what is as you know it and leave it at that. had you have been brought up to utilize your potential, i doubt you would need any concept of something greater to feel 'safe'.

dice, it sounds like you need to go do a basic biology lesson (or google) on instinct.

Please.

Emotions are percieved by the mind, facilitated by the brain and the body. The mind does not equal the brain.

Hahaha I like how Toll's post was skipped.

Why are there these Interactions? Probably because they are needed, exactly, for this universe to be stable? Why is the universe stable? Probably because it needs to be stable in order to exist? Why does the universe exist? Who knows, it just does, it just is.
So looking deeply, we see that the grass is indeed green, simply because it is.

I laughed at this post, not because it's bad, but because it's actually quite true and it's wording was comical :)

If you start going too deep you start basically searching for the answer to the question "what is the meaning to life" and "why does the universe exist?" (cue religion debate AGAIN).

I concur with both of Toll's posts.

last edited by Loki at 01:22:00 10/Mar/06

The closest I'll get to discussing religion is by thanking god for Boobs!

i don't really need to study biology when i can just look to how i and the people i've spoken to about this sort of thing think ... we don't care when the female is in her cycle, how does your point stand then?

tal, the brain is not the mind, but the mind is part of the brain

Let me make that nice and clear, for the last time,

instinct

(part of any fundamental biology course afaik)

It's got nothing to do with what people want to think, although being conscious free-willed beings we can make a decision to ignore our instincts, but they're still there at the lowest level of living.

last edited by eXemplar at 02:00:30 10/Mar/06

yeah it's instinct/subconsciously communicated through feeling to help guide us toward what we have been programmed for through evolution

and based on that, i still say that i couldn't care less when a woman is in her cycle ... i've never felt it before, i've only ever felt attracted based on who the girl was and how much hormonal influence i had within me (ie. how long it had been since i had been last 'relieved')

so now where does your logic stand, genius? go study, kid, quit wasting my time.

there definately is something about boobies

for goodys bucks party, we ended up at bad girls and i was totally transfixed by some fat heffer, just coz of her super boobies

the boys all tried to talk me out of geting a lappy with her, but i couldnt resist
COULDNT RESIST

i dont think i looked at her face or punda zone once, but oh baby, did i man handle her boobies hardcore

mmmm, heaven

so there you go, even fat ugly birds can be worth spending money on a lap dance on if they have teh nice boobies

clearly that means that you are still a dirty whore, and you put up FOUL pictures of yourself all over the internets

She may not be an oil painting, but she's hardly foul. also 1000% better than you'll probably ever got.

I didn't know such a raging argument could come from the topic 'breasts'. Some guys prefer big tits, some prefer small tits, some prefer bitch tits on a man. Who gives a f*** what it is about them that some find attractive? That's like saying 'Well I like ice-cream, everyone I ever met likes ice-cream, so everyone must like ice-cream!'

Also, Dice, you're far to arrogant to take seriously. Your one-track highly-self-assured mind makes it seems to me that you're still raging against the bully that stuffed your head down the toilet once to many times in primary school. People's oppinions will occasionally differ from your own, so the sooner you learn to compromise, even if you KNOW they're wrong, the sooner that massive vein in your forhead will die down and you can, you know, get laid or have fun or something. Excuse the assumption that you don't get laid or have fun, but you know what, I think you don't.

Hooray for boobies!
Hooray for Zoidberg!
http://users3.ev1.net/~d_c_lee/sonofatpatcher2/zoidberg.jpg

Entertainment ++

Thanks ppl. I don't think I've ever laughed sooo hard in my life.

I think the human female is going to get bigger breasted over the next 50 generations. large breasts are evolutionary prefereable, meaning a larger proportion of big breasted women will have children compared to small breasted women. In every subsequeent generation, the genes for big breasts become more prolific and everyone wins!

subtle selective pressures ftw :D

large breasts are evolutionary prefereable

Really? Back probs, movement constraints, hmmm...

I think this is proof that God is a woman :P

In the immortal words of René Descartes - "I like boobies therefore I am".

How bout you stfu Two&Eight,

dice is more than allowed to have his own opinions on anything.
If you can't deal with the fact that that is just the way things are, you are seriously screwed up in the head. People differ in their views, get over it.

dice is a f***ing champion, and is going to end up with an awesome chick with the way he views women. Chick's easily see past the shallowness (unless they are sluts).

Really? Back probs, movement constraints, hmmm...

so long as these things don't prevent the person from reaching child-bearing maturity and raising their offspring, then these things will never be 'corrected' through natural selection.

and based on that, i still say that i couldn't care less when a woman is in her cycle ... i've never felt it before, i've only ever felt attracted based on who the girl was and how much hormonal influence i had within me (ie. how long it had been since i had been last 'relieved')

so now where does your logic stand, genius? go study, kid, quit wasting my time.

As I said, being conscious free-willed beings etc. PS. I was never using logic, I was quoting from reference material (albeit wikipedia), you were just using your experience. I sure know which one makes the world turn around.

So before insulting me, try disproving what you think with at least a bit more credible backup than, "I, me, myself."

last edited by eXemplar at 10:57:49 10/Mar/06

In the immortal words of René Descartes - "I like boobies therefore I am"

LOL

last edited by amyescence at 11:01:26 10/Mar/06

so long as these things don't prevent the person from reaching child-bearing maturity and raising their offspring, then these things will never be 'corrected' through natural selection.

Don't fall victim to the fallacy of the false dichotomy there, Korbs.

Ze men will always love the women... :P

Korbs, you are aware that breasts can change sizes when a woman is pregnant, they can grow bigger or smaller.
I also have a vague recollection that the amount of breast milk, and quality of the milk is not in proportion to the size of the breasts.
So having bigger breasts dosnt mean you are better able to have more children.

care to elaborate on that, Agent99..i don't see a false dichotomy there ??

edit for Toll: No, they don't give any kind of utilitarian advantagewith the actual feeding of the children, but that was never my point.

my point, in simple terms is:

Men prefer big breasts over small breasts. Therefore, it is statistically more likely that women with big breasts will get a partner and mate (note, this is only a tiny percentage, but over a population of ~3 billion females it adds up). This means that *more* female children of the following generation will have the big breast gene(s) (they inherit these from their mothers).

This process repeats for 50 or 100 generations and over time, the proportion of big breasted women in the general population becomes larger.

If you accept the 'general rule' that most men prefer big breasts (and assume this will stay constant), then this is the evolutionary consequence of that statement.

Mind you, i'm just using armchair reasoning here and have no figures to back me up.



last edited by korbs at 11:37:20 10/Mar/06

last edited by korbs at 11:39:12 10/Mar/06

Nude kat pics are far more tasteful then nude stinky pics... I bet ditch has stinky.zip

Nudes can be very tasteful... is the implication that Kat is a whore for doing nudes, or more because of the way they were staged (I've not seen them)?

They're boobs, Ed.

They're boobs, Ed.

Erin Brockovich fan, huh?

haha, yeah let's talk about who we should take seriously.

Some guys prefer big tits, some prefer small tits, some prefer bitch tits on a man. Who gives a f*** what it is about them that some find attractive?

Yes, definitely the person who doesn't want to learn more about the world they're a part of. They'll show us the way. You sound pretty arrogant yourself, saying you can't take me seriously because I appear arrogant? That's a pretty strong assumption, and then you make several other extremely strong statements as if you 'KNOW' like no other 'KNOWS'. Why don't you compromise with me? Take your own advice, hypocrite. Actually, why don't you just listen to and accept my opinion as fact? At least you'll be right for a change. FEAR THE ARROGANCE.

eXemp, so what exactly are you trying to argue? seeing as you're still just dodging the bullet by not answering my question. here, i'll repeat it: How can you say it's a matter of instinct toward a girl's cycle when we are wanting to have sex with them when males are clearly after sex whenever they want it, regardless of the female cycle/what she wants? You got to be so fkng stupid to not understand something so simple. And it's not just me, I talk to a lot of people, I know what they think and how they react to things. Seems to me you don't think much of actual experience? Think about it, if some retarded article on the internet told you that 1+2=5, would you believe that despite common sense/simple logic or what? Honestly, get a clue or be quiet.


One last point: a lot of guys want sex daily ... are girls in their cycle every day of the year? God damn, have you got anything to back you stupid fkn self up besides that article which you probably misread anyway!?

ARGH. Why do people think it so necessary to argue stupid points. I'm going to have to learn to just let it go soon, which is boring, I love replying and insulting to this kind of stuff.

I celebrate Julia Roberts' ouevre. It's those giant choppers. Like Tori Spelling and Donny Osmond, Julia is an international ambassador for big-ass teeth.


And I am also a fan of boobs.

I find it helpful at times like these to remind myself that our true enemy is instinct. Instinct was our mother when we were an infant species. Instinct coddled us and kept us safe in those hardscrabble years when we hardened our sticks and cooked our first meals above a meager fire, and started at the shadows that leapt upon the cavern's walls. But inseparable from instinct is its dark twin, superstition. Instinct is inextricably bound to unreasoning impulses, and today we clearly see its true nature. Instinct has just become aware of its irrelevance, and like a cornered beast, it will not go down without a bloody fight. Instinct would inflict a fatal injury on our species. Instinct creates its own oppressors, and bids us rise up against them. Instinct tells us that the unknown is a threat, rather than an opportunity. Instinct slyly and covertly compels us away from change and progress. Instinct, therefore, must be expunged. It must be fought tooth and nail, beginning with the basest of human urges: the urge to reproduce.

you rock, fpot

that said, if we are to continue as a species and live healthily (maintaining our emotions as much as physical being), then we do need the instincts that drive us toward reproduction. i don't see it as a foe, but i understand every urge and thus can make a logical decision on what to do about those urges.

So (ignoring your retarded defense by attack there dice, good work btw), I'll go through your comments and point out how you're totally misunderstanding the basic concepts of your question.

eXemp, so what exactly are you trying to argue?

That it's not just what you think about sex to be true, there is a deeper fundamental meaning to why men like breasts.

seeing as you're still just dodging the bullet by not answering my question.

So how is defending what you say by attacking what I say any different ?

How can you say it's a matter of instinct toward a girl's cycle when we are wanting to have sex with them when males are clearly after sex whenever they want it, regardless of the female cycle/what she wants?

Since when has reproduction had anything to do with what the girl wants (I'm talking ancient here). Reproduction is about survival of the species and of your line, I'm sure the cavemen talked it over with their ladies and made sure they felt ok about sex. Also, I'm talking about sex in terms of propogation and procreation, not just because you want to have sex.

You got to be so fkng stupid to not understand something so simple.

I fail to see how thousands of years of evolutionary instinct can be defined as simple. May just be me, though.

And it's not just me, I talk to a lot of people, I know what they think and how they react to things. Seems to me you don't think much of actual experience?

So why were you asking why people liked breasts so much and that you preferred ass then ?

Think about it, if some retarded article on the internet told you that 1+2=5, would you believe that despite common sense/simple logic or what? Honestly, get a clue or be quiet.

I'm sorry for taking the time to research some reference material in some form of encyclopedia. I will only use my blasé misconceptions and abuse anyone who says otherwise from now on.

One last point: a lot of guys want sex daily

Correct, this is a fundamental urge. Why ? Because our instincts are telling us to multiply. Why are you wrong ? Because you look too much into the shallow looks and recreational sex.

are girls in their cycle every day of the year?

No, but I'd imagine their breasts enlarging slightly would give it away.

God damn, have you got anything to back you stupid fkn self up besides that article which you probably misread anyway!?

I gave you a good starting point.

Have a nice day.

last edited by eXemplar at 12:57:58 10/Mar/06

THE BOOBS WOULD NEVER GET OFF THE ESCALATOR IF THEY ARE TRAVELING AT THE SAME SPEED.

That it's not just what you think about sex to be true, there is a deeper fundamental meaning to why men like breasts.

Yeah, of course there is ... we've already gone through them.
1) because they will feed the children when they are born.
2) they further distinguish differences between females and males
3) society has taught many of us to think that way

So how is defending what you say by attacking what I say any different ?

I'm doing a little more than just 'attacking', I'm also laying down the basis of my reasoning. What are you doing apart from saying I'm attacking you?

Since when has reproduction had anything to do with what the girl wants (I'm talking ancient here). Reproduction is about survival of the species and of your line, I'm sure the cavemen talked it over with their ladies and made sure they felt ok about sex. Also, I'm talking about sex in terms of propogation and procreation, not just because you want to have sex.

We 'want' things based on emotional impulse, which comes directly from instinct when it comes to sex. I'm also talking about sex in terms of procreation.

I fail to see how thousands of years of evolutionary instinct can be defined as simple. May just be me, though.

Yeah, just you. Sure it's taken a lot of time to evolve, but now that it's here, it's easy to understand.

So why were you asking why people liked breasts so much and that you preferred ass then ?

Because the facts stand that breasts should not be an absolute turn-on and hailed as almost gods.

I'm sorry for taking the time to research some reference material in some form of encyclopedia. I will only use my blasé misconceptions and abuse anyone who says otherwise from now on.

So you read something some guy with what real credentials wrote, and then swear by it, before even looking at what it's really like in real life? You can tell me you've researched until you're blue in the face, but when it comes down to it, the facts speak for themselves: WE DON'T JUST WANT SEX WHEN THE FEMALE IS IN HER CYCLE.

Correct, this is a fundamental urge. Why ? Because our instincts are telling us to multiply. Why are you wrong ? Because you look too much into the shallow looks and recreational sex.

I'd laugh if you could reach the levels of depth I can. Try calling someone else shallow, bub. A lot of guys want sex daily, WHY? Because our instincts are telling us to multiply, AND due the need to reproduce sperm rather than have a set amount throughout our lives, we must use the 'equipment' so to speak in order to maintain it at a healthy level. Have you never heard that if you don't release it that it can do a fair amount of damage and even make you sterile? I should find the report on that. Either way, there are more reasons to why we need sex daily than just "our instincts tell us to". You, sir, are the shallow one here ... Instinct just gives the message, logic will give you the reason, try it sometime.

No, but I'd imagine their breasts enlarging slightly would give it away.

And? It would be minor, and I bet a guy who goes for breasts will go for the girl with the bigger set that isn't in her cycle than the girl with almost a flat chest but has got slightly larger than her usual due to her cycle. Your point was of little relevance. When are you going to stop having so much faith in yourself? I'm backed up by facts as I'm showing here, what are you backed up by?

I gave you a good starting point.

No you didn't.

keke I copy pasted a direct quite from Dr Breen from Half Life 2 :D

bewbs rock that is all. i don't have any idea wtf you twats can find to write essays about in this thread, but you clearly need more bewbage to play with and less time on the puter.

Well from my own personal tastes and experiences I like a medium to large breasted woman however, if she was "the one" for me then it wouldn't matter what the physical appearence was.

Yeah, of course there is ... we've already gone through them.

So then why should we like a good arse better than good breasts ? I'm not saying we don't, but why one over the other ?

I'm doing a little more than just 'attacking', I'm also laying down the basis of my reasoning. What are you doing apart from saying I'm attacking you?

There has been no real basis. Explaining.

So you read something some guy with what real credentials wrote, and then swear by it, before even looking at what it's really like in real life? You can tell me you've researched until you're blue in the face, but when it comes down to it, the facts speak for themselves: WE DON'T JUST WANT SEX WHEN THE FEMALE IS IN HER CYCLE.

So what is it like in real life ? I see many people attracted to breasts, and people attracted to a nice rounded buttock, but I also see a lot more and hear a lot more about a breast than an arse cheek. Sure we now don't want sex just because the female is in her cycle, because as sentient human beings we aren't about our base instincts anymore.

You asked for a scientific reason, and I found one and pasted it. It is a valid point.

You then queried as to why it would be such a strong attraction. I just did a quick google on breast attraction and found a few pages saying that a possible reason for a strong breast attraction is just that, they're for attraction. As a first impression you'd see a woman (generally ;-)) from the front on, not from a rear low end perspective, so as a first impression they do a good job.

It was then you started on the 'love making', and about what you feel/need. Which was why I related to us being the free-willed beings we are and able to make the conscious decision to 'get over' our instincts, but that does not simply mean they are not there. Shortly after, you started on me personally, which was where I started to defend my position.

I presented an arguement to the for, and was knocked down. I talk about ancient humans and instinct, yet it's still about how you feel. How is that logical ?

Sure, I could've presented more hard evidence, but where have you done that ? Hell, I'm sure a google on breast evolutionary purpose could bring up more evidence and facts than what you have so far.

So excuse me for defending a view point. My arguement has never been about what I think and feel, or want. Yours came down to, "I'd laugh if you could reach the levels of depth I can." and, "And it's not just me, I talk to a lot of people, I know what they think and how they react to things." I'm not saying that what I quoted was entirely factual, but as a theory it makes a hell of a lot of sense. I never swore by it, I defended it. And as too 'what it's like in real life' well I still think one of the basis of this arguement was 'why are breasts more attractive than other body parts'.

So until you are willing to go beyond your current lines thinkingl, as I did when I originally started looking into this, I'm not going to press this anymore. The only credible statement you've made is, "we must use the 'equipment' so to speak in order to maintain it at a healthy level."

WHAT THE f*** IS GOING ON IN THIS THREAD

yes, praise the boobs.

So then why should we like a good arse better than good breasts ? I'm not saying we don't, but why one over the other ?

Because that is the place we actually need to 'use' to ensure we procreate. The attraction must be to that area so we want to thrust/mount etc.

There has been no real basis. Explaining.

The basis was that in real life, not just in theory, with every guy I know, they don't have any inclination toward the woman's cycle when it comes to wanting sex, it is all about their own need and thus desire.

So what is it like in real life ? I see many people attracted to breasts, and people attracted to a nice rounded buttock, but I also see a lot more and hear a lot more about a breast than an arse cheek.

That is my dilemma, I'm trying to say that people should not be so attracted to breasts, as you really can't do much with them. How many children will you have exclusively playing with breasts? Breasts have very little to do with us, our terrain is the lower region.

so as a first impression they do a good job.

That is a statement based on how you feel toward breasts. I personally think the girl's face does a better job, seeing as you can a heck of a lot more about her by her face than her breasts, and thus you will be able to make a better decision in the long run about whether you would like to procreate with her or not.

I presented an arguement to the for, and was knocked down. I talk about ancient humans and instinct, yet it's still about how you feel. How is that logical ?

Not completely sure what you're trying to say here, but my guess response is: ancient humans and instinct contributed a lot to the way we feel even today, and it is not all that different. The reason we go back to them is to see how it all began - why we are attracted to certain things. I just think we've lost our way a bit being so attracted to breasts is all.

Sure, I could've presented more hard evidence, but where have you done that ? Hell, I'm sure a google on breast evolutionary purpose could bring up more evidence and facts than what you have so far.

Yeah, I'm sure I haven't listed absolutely every possible reason to why breasts have become so attractive, but I'd say even with all those points, I'd still come out on top of this, because simple and fundamental logic has a much better track record of prevailing.

My arguement has never been about what I think and feel, or want.

So let me get this straight, oh mr 'still think you have half a clue', you're trying to argue something based entirely on other's opinions, without applying those opinions to real life to gain a better understanding? And you wonder why I insult you? Yeesh. Look, it's good you found a new perspective, but try do a little more research before arguing it and expecting me to be nice to you about it when you're giving me bs opinions based on next to nothing. It's wasting my time and yours.

My 'current lines of thinking' are constantly evolving. I'm not one that resides in "What I want to be true". I gave that up years ago when I realised God and the Spirit world really didn't, and couldn't exist (yes, I was once like these moronic christians who placed faith in things greater than this reality. Been there, done that, seen the flip side of the coin, now I know much better). I look to facts and observe the effects surrounding those facts to gain a better understanding.

And by the way, you're a fool if you call me shallow when first you relied on someone else's opinion, and then didn't do research beyond that to prove its credibility.

I never called you shallow "Because you look too much into the shallow looks and recreational sex." I called the looks of a person shallow. You keep referring to what you think, how you feel. You keep attacking my arguments with, "Ok, so I ... || I think || In my life || I personally" and end with "You ... || You should || Do this || "

And now, seeing as I've dropped the subject, I bet you're going to go on, "Oh, you couldn't win anyway, so don't try" line.

As for the credibility of my arguments, all you've said proves nothing against it, only what you think.

I'm still waiting on facts. I'm still waiting for a defense, not an attack. I'm still wondering why you insulted me over showing you what someone else has said (in a reference context, mind) and my belief that that is probably true.

My arguement has never been about what I think and feel, or want.

So let me get this straight, oh mr 'still think you have half a clue', you're trying to argue something based entirely on other's opinions, without applying those opinions to real life to gain a better understanding?

I try to base my *beliefs* (and I probably shouldn't have put an emphasis on think there) on what I find and appear to have a good grounding. Then applying that belief to real life does work, as we can see people love the boobies.

when you're giving me bs opinions based on next to nothing

So what have you said that isn't based on opinion?

You guys do realise that if the boobs were powered at the nipples, it would eventually take off.

i support boobies

I like how you assume that referring to the structure of my responses somehow degrades what I'm saying and gives you more credibility. Nice try, but let's stick to what's being said rather than how it's being said, instead of crying about being insulted or whatever that dribble was.

I never called you shallow "Because you look too much into the shallow looks and recreational sex."

Um, this is funny. So you're saying you never called me shallow, but in the same line, you tell me that I look too much into the shallow looks and recreational sex, which is basically saying I'm looking at something shallow and therefore no matter how deep I go into it, it still remains shallow. But if that's what I look at, and I obvoiusly don't go into deeper topics (according to you), then does not that make me shallow?

Nice one.

And now, seeing as I've dropped the subject, I bet you're going to go on, "Oh, you couldn't win anyway, so don't try" line.

I wouldn't say that. You wouldn't have won because you're just not right about this, and you're too limited to comprehend the weight of all that I'm really saying. So you might as well just give up now. HAHAHA I JUST DID A YOU! LOOK, NOW I'M AN IDIOT.

As for the credibility of my arguments, all you've said proves nothing against it, only what you think.

Are you just randomly spouting bs now hoping that it somehow holds up? You're the one that took on the idea that breasts became attractive during her cycle because that's how we'd be able to tell. This is based on nothing except an idea of some retard that wrote an internet article. If you just look for a moment to real life, you'll note that no male looks to breasts to see if she's in her cycle, whether through subconscious (instinct) or primary conscious, it just doesn't happen. Nobody cares, our want for sex--you can't possibly deny this unless you are completely ignorant--is based on how our reproductive system works (needs to be used) and so we want sex a fair amount, regardless of whether the woman is in her cycle. I could go on about the details of this, but this is all you really need to know for the point.

I'm still waiting on facts.

These are facts, and I've said them at least 4 or 5 times now. It's a defence, not an attack, and I insulted you because I don't like idiots who think they know what they're talking about. Get a clue. Oh and don't use the line "well you must not like yourself then," it'll just confirm without a doubt that you're a moron.

I try to base my *beliefs* (and I probably shouldn't have put an emphasis on think there) on what I find and appear to have a good grounding. Then applying that belief to real life does work, as we can see people love the boobies.

I try to base my beliefs on what I find and appear to have good grounding as well, just I've got a lot more grounding than one internet site's opinion which probably comes from someone who has only seen pictures of girls on his computer. Yes people love boobies, my argument, if you missed it - like everything else, is that they shouldn't be seen as like the holy grail, as they have very little purpose when it comes to us. They should be appreciated, not drooled over.

So what have you said that isn't based on opinion?

Are you serious?

One - guys need sex/relief either daily or weekly, regardless of whether a woman is present or in her cycle. FACT.
Two - breasts have very little to do with us when it comes to the procreation game, their biological purpose is to feed the newborn, whereas the vagina is the entry point which we can inseminate through, thus being a better attraction point for us - but because we don't see it clearly when are having sex in the standard missionary position, what really becomes attractive is everything we can see - namely the woman's buttocks, hips and so on. The attraction is there to draw us toward that area so we have the desire to thrust. FACT.
Three - the reason we want sex is subconsciously is to reproduce, the rest is a byproduct of that initial reason. FACT.

They're the facts that contribute to the overall topic of why breasts shouldn't hold this much attraction. A lot of the rest is opinion, but that opinion is pretty well thought out and has a strong basis.

http://images.ausgamers.com/girls/babes/Estella_Warren/Estella_Warren038.jpg

i too support boobies. DDs are my preference.

bah wins the thread

Would it be inappropriate to turn this thread into a 'post your favourite pair of boobs' show & tell.

I'll start.

http://www.saigonnet.vn/gallery/gallery/Mode/Laetitia-Casta/106.jpg

Laetitia Casta has the world's best rack, imo.

now you...

http://people.freenet.de/richards001/05-lrg.jpg

Gays like to talk deep and meaningful with girls, and they like ass.

Therefore, dice must be gay.

Q.E.D

Why are people talking in a thread about boobs?

http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/8585/19xa1.jpg

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y154/tiny04/dd1_breanne_1.jpg

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y154/tiny04/lisa-03.jpg

Gays like to talk deep and meaningful with girls, and they like ass.

Therefore, dice must be gay.

Q.E.D

poor loki, sucks so hard at life, why don't you start another thread with another big whinge about how you're so unhappy, emo f*****

http://img122.imageshack.us/img122/7487/mmm2dn.jpg

Now Elvira had some New York titties..

Dice, you're still saying nothing but what you think.

One - guys need sex/relief either daily or weekly, regardless of whether a woman is present or in her cycle. FACT.

Says who ?
Two - breasts have very little to do with us when it comes to the procreation game, their biological purpose is to feed the newborn, whereas the vagina is the entry point which we can inseminate through, thus being a better attraction point for us - but because we don't see it clearly when are having sex in the standard missionary position, what really becomes attractive is everything we can see - namely the woman's buttocks, hips and so on. The attraction is there to draw us toward that area so we have the desire to thrust. FACT.
Who ever said they weren't ? It's also a FACT that they do swell during ovulation. And I think part of the 'procreation game' is also the attraction, no ?

Three - the reason we want sex is subconsciously is to reproduce, the rest is a byproduct of that initial reason. FACT.

This is what I've been saying, yet still nothing to do with teh boobies.

People also believed from their 'real world' experiences (that you are apparently so filled to the brim you don't need to back up anything you say with hard evidence other than a capitalised FACT) that the earth was flat.

So, back to your original question (to which I was apparently too stupid to understand),

How can you say it's a matter of instinct toward a girl's cycle when we are wanting to have sex with them when males are clearly after sex whenever they want it, regardless of the female cycle/what she wants? You got to be so fkng stupid to not understand something so simple.

So, what part of ovulation wouldn't an ancient human wanted ? I'm guessing the fact that the female was effectively in heat meant totally nothing. Clearly the males were after the females when they were at their most infertile stage of their cycle.

May be old but completely relevant for this thread.

Big Ass Titties

poor loki, sucks so hard at life, why don't you start another thread with another big whinge about how you're so unhappy, emo f*****

That was gimpy actually.

^
Hmmm, speaking of which - haven't seen him on QGL for a good few days. Odd.

He was drunk posting about 2 days ago.

exemp, i dunno if it's just tonight, but i don't care, go find something else to do, i cbb reading all that

Boobies are gods way of telling us that he is real.

the boys all tried to talk me out of geting a lappy with her, but i couldnt resist
COULDNT RESIST

i dont think i looked at her face or punda zone once, but oh baby, did i man handle her boobies hardcore

mmmm, heaven

so there you go, even fat ugly birds can be worth spending money on a lap dance on if they have teh nice boobies

I'm going to pretend you didn't say that.....

Boobies are boobs, there is no two ways about it.

they get all the pretty bras without having to pay a mint for them. Wenches.

And they get to shop anywhere, rather than 'specialised' shopes

...clearly that means that you are still a dirty whore, and you put up FOUL pictures of yourself all over the internets, and then you say WELL I BET YOU'VE JERKED OFF TO THE PHOTOS OF ME, I BET, HAVENT YOU HUH?!?!? in your defense.

Dude it is 2006. Get over it already. 4 years is a long time to hold onto such hatred


As for boob size. Like anything you can get too big and too small. I don't think men automaticly go for 'big breasted women' because of the whole have more babies theory but I do think having boobs helps.

First time I was pregnant the boobs got bigger....then smaller (about 6mths after)...then bigger than they were previously. So being pregnant helped me boost my boob size. Gotta be happy with that :)

pics or lying

pics or lying

That's what got her in trouble in the first place.

Yeah, lying will always get you in trouble...

what's the obsession with bouncing breasts? better yet, what's with the obsession with breasts at all? yes, they're what will feed your children to help them grow one day ... and yes they represent the female form to a degree, so what?


damn kids

Look, just because you like men, doesn't mean everyone else likes men, OK? Get over it, hetrosexual men like boobs. I understand why you don't get it.

Personally, I like boobs the size of dinner plates.

Personally, I like boobs the size of dinner plates.

Good golly. I can only imagine the back problems a girl with THOSE appendages would have.

imo ... typo needs to post pics of his boobs ... for manlissa

they get all the pretty bras without having to pay a mint for them. Wenches.
And they get to shop anywhere, rather than 'specialised' shopes

True, but retailers are catering for a bigger market nowadays - I don't think it's that much of an effort for bigger breasted women anymore, esp given the "average" woman in Australia is a 12B/C.

Look, just because you like men, doesn't mean everyone else likes men, OK? Get over it, hetrosexual men like boobs. I understand why you don't get it.

most likely because you're too f***ing stupid to even be close to my level. poor little animal, go back to reacting to life, emo bitch.

natural selection will rule your bs out one day. the world will be out of tissues long before then though.

I don't think it's that much of an effort for bigger breasted women anymore, esp given the "average" woman in Australia is a 12B/C.

Let me guess, you are less than a C cup right?
Oh and I should add, no I am not picking on you. I just know how when I was a C cup I was oblivious as to how easy I had it and just assumed every other size was as readily available. Then you go up one cup size and you have to dig deep for bras

last edited by Kat at 13:42:04 13/Mar/06

All women on QGL should post their cup sizes, for.....a data base I'm working on, yea, a data base.

Even I don't know that information

Kat: Let me guess, you are less than a C cup right?

Yah. But I don't think what cup size I am personally is really relevant. I still have eyes and see what kind of underwear is available when I go shopping.

Oh and I should add, no I am not picking on you.

Yah, I know. It's cool - I figure you're just trying to make a point :).

I just know how when I was a C cup I was oblivious as to how easy I had it and just assumed every other size was as readily available. Then you go up one cup size and you have to dig deep for bras

Hmmm - I don't know about that one. I definetely think there is a *greatER* selection of underwear available for smaller breasted women (say, below 12B), and that some of the stuff is prettier and more delicate (because less support is needed), but I don't by any means think that there is a lack of choice of underwear for bigger breasted women.

My mums a D cup (no, unfortunately I didn't inherit her genes - but that's cool, I like my smaller breasts) and I don't think she's ever had a problem with finding nice underwear. The only thing I suppose is that you can't buy some of the more delicate, lacier, thinner strapped ones - but I suppose that's more of a practicality thing - if you have larger breasts, you're gonna need something with support (otherwise the bra is useless)...amirite??

Tanaka Khan: All women on QGL should post their cup sizes, for.....a data base I'm working on, yea, a data base.

LOL. Nice try TK.

Kat: Even I don't know that information

I'm confused - u don't know your own bra size? Sorry, perhaps I'm reading that comment wrong :S.




last edited by Agent 99 at 16:29:15 13/Mar/06

You can get very nice underwear for the D+ cups but as said earlier they are a lot more expensive than the smaller cups. I believe mainly because at least in the smaller cups you have the ability to shop at cheaper stores where as with the bigger cups you don't, or at least they aren't cheaper at those stores :)

I'm confused - u don't know you're own bra size? Sorry, perhaps I'm reading that comment wrong :S.

No you are reading it right. At the moment I have no idea what bra size I am. All I know is that I need a fitting but, due to the above, can't afford it

edit: yup definately too much talk about my boobs. Finish now!

last edited by Kat at 16:15:31 13/Mar/06

You can get very nice underwear for the D+ cups but as said earlier they are a lot more expensive than the smaller cups. I believe mainly because at least in the smaller cups you have the ability to shop at cheaper stores where as with the bigger cups you don't, or at least they aren't cheaper at those stores :)

Hmmm, yah. I suppose that's true. I have a really bad habit of going for the more expensive stuff anyways, so I feel the pain too :S...or at least, my savings account does :P.

I'm confused - u don't know you're own bra size? Sorry, perhaps I'm reading that comment wrong :S.

No you are reading it right. At the moment I have no idea what bra size I am. All I know is that I need a fitting but, due to the above, can't afford it

Ah...that's not good! Go to Bra's n Things or Myer, and they'll fit you for free!

All women on QGL should post their cup sizes, for.....a data base I'm working on, yea, a data base.

gee, that wasn't one of the lamest attempts at being funny ever made on here. +1 retard point.

also, this shows just how moronic this bs is, what the hell is knowing a girl's cup size through a forum really going to do for you? do cap'd letters turn you on? here, i'll give you some: AA HHA U RLY SUCK BB BA AH HAHH A

Hmmm, yah. I suppose that's true. I have a really bad habit of going for the more expensive stuff anyways, so I feel the pain too :S...or at least, my savings account does :P.

As long as you don't pay $210 for a bra I won't have to slap you.

I still can't believe women pay that much!!!!! I still can't believe I know women who pay that much!!!!!

LOL. No, never spent that much on a bra. You can buy a *really* nice, good quality, matching bra and brief for about $100 - $130 normally. I don't think I would ever really spend more than that - the only women I know that do are insecure and suffer from low self-esteem, and (for them) feel a need to spend up big on everything to make themselves feel good :S (at least that's my opinion on the matter anyway).

i dont give a s*** what brand undies i buy
tho i admit im not a big fan on the ones my nana kits for me

imo ... typo needs to post pics of his boobs ... for manlissa

Sure, that's why you suggested it.

gee, that wasn't one of the lamest attempts at being funny ever made on here. +1 retard point.

And that comment hurts me SO MUCH because I truely value your opinion. It got a chuckle from Agent 99 so I'm happy.

At the moment I have no idea what bra size I am.

i can help out with that, i do free checks!

And that comment hurts me SO MUCH because I truely value your opinion. It got a chuckle from Agent 99 so I'm happy.

hurt enough to reply with attempted sarcasm, also means you value my opinion to some degree, otherwise you'd not have replied

thanks, you have honoured me

When it all comes down to it, I think we can all agree there's nothing wrong with teh boobz.

yeah i can agree with that

Then by your logic you must value my opinion just as much for replying to me. But hey, lets look at some other things you've replied too -

these tards are still back in preschool when it comes to insulting/debating/

do cap'd letters turn you on? here, i'll give you some: AA HHA U RLY SUCK BB BA AH HAHH A

Oh yes, your insults are much more sophisticated than ours, you just reek of class there dice, or is that something else I smell there??

what, you can't appreciate the creativity?

and i'm not the one that's making claims of not valuing people's opinions


it's pretty easy to not load qgl forum, i'm here by choice. when your idiocy gets a bit boring, i'll move onto something else. for now, this is fun.

what, you can't appreciate the creativity?

You claim that our insults are childish then you resort to them yourself? There's no creativity there, only stupidity. dice you've surpassed boring and gone straight into monotonous. When you get a clue, come back and we'll try again.

and i'm not the one that's making claims of not valuing people's opinions

Oh, and for your information, I only value the opinion's of people I actually respect, and you my friend, don't even rate a foot note in the history of people I've known.

last edited by Tanaka Khan at 02:02:13 14/Mar/06

wow, you are so off the point i don't even have a response for you ... that i can be bothered typing out anyway

LOL, no come back eh? If you couldn't be bothered typing a come back then why type anything? Game, set and match.

i said you were off the point, therefore you needed to give me something that was on the point before i gave you a decent reply

checkmate?

This must be a change TK, flaming instead of being flamed.

ahhaha dice you f***head, go move on, no one likes you here

You've got nothing dice, quit clutching at straws and move on. You still have two other threads in which you're having your arse handed to you, maybe it's best if you consolidate your arguments into one and go from there.

This must be a change TK, flaming instead of being flamed.

LOL, I guess it all rubbed off on me, I suppose I have persay, hashy, fpot and the many others to thank for it. =)

i just came in at this page, what are you people whining about

i still maintain anyone who disagrees with me is wrong, and my ass hasn't been handed to me, it's just the sheer number of you is making it next to impossible to reply in depth to any

and 'move on, no one likes you here' ... sounds more like the phrase of your life

you're all a bunch of whiney little girls who have no clue what life is or what it's about

and that is why i'll succeed, and you will all fail.

hahahahahahahahahahaa
last laugh mother f***ers, you lose. not that you'll ever realise just how badly ;)

i'm going back to paradise, LATER YO! (yeah moving on, but i swear it's out of boredom and not because a few pussies don't want me here, as far as i can see, flaming is just the way of things on qgl forum, everyone has been insulted at some stage, you bitches love it. that aside, it still doesn't bother me, why would i give power over my mind to dumbasses? answer: i wouldn't, i've just been having a bit of fun shouting out some opinions for a change, i knew damn well what responses i'd get, that's why no one knows my thoughts offline).

And that my friends, is how it's done. No doubt the whiny little bitch will be back though.

it still doesn't bother me

Yet he STILL goes on about it. Get a clue and toughen up in life boy, because you sure as s*** can't handle QGL.

that's why no one knows my thoughts offline

That's a good thing, cause you suck badly.

tk/dice/gimpy

PLZ STOP POSTING YOU ARE RUINING MY BOOBIES BUZZ

someone post some more pix or girls, keep talking about yor boobies,

lets get this back on track

yes siree, thats what im talking aboot

come on now baby, drop some redfooted booby on me

you know i want it

GIVE IT TO ME

This one is a bit young, but you know...



last edited by Rodolphe at 08:27:40 14/Mar/06

/* pants off

wow even gimpy doesn't like dice. you must really suck buddy.

^looks up.

well, that certainly got messy with class. thanks to all involved.
and i am surprised that it took so long for actual pictures of boobs to come out.
and now there are some tits too!

last edited by z0r at 19:26:41 14/Mar/06