|
![]() |
|
| Author |
|
|||||||
|
Creepy
Posts: 900
Location: USA
|
||||||||
| #0 08:21am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
system
|
--
|
|||||||
| #0 |
|
|||||||
|
Bah
Posts: 2747
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Hopefully they are just holding back the "hulk f***s s*** up" parts of the movie from the trailer.
|
|||||||
| #1 06:02am 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
B.Hardball
Posts: 7712
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I found the first one waaaaaaaaay to lame to get excited about a sequel regardless of how good it looks. But, the cast looks awesome (Edward Norton, Ed Harris, Tim Roth and Liv Tyler ftmfw). Too bad Hulk is just another stupid looking CGI creation. They should have got one of the current body builders instead and used camera trickery like in LOTR to make him look even bigger.
http://www.energikakan.se/images/TG_MR.gif |
|||||||
| #2 08:16am 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Reverend Evil™
Posts: 15541
Location: Wynnum, Queensland
|
Doesn't look the best so it'll be a DVD one for me. And yeah, I'd prolly prefer a real person playing the Hulk or even like the way they did that rock guy from Fantastic Four. The cgi still looks too fake to be convincing.
|
|||||||
| #3 09:25am 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Khel
Posts: 12290
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
So is it following on from the first one, or pretending the first one didn't happen?
|
|||||||
| #4 09:46am 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
demon
Posts: 3310
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
first hulk movie was woeful... this looks just as bad imo.
|
|||||||
| #5 10:02am 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Creepy
Posts: 901
Location: USA
|
So is it following on from the first one, or pretending the first one didn't happen? Apparently while it isn't a complete reboot, it will only very loosely refer to some parts of the previous film - essentially, it's a sequel only to his 'origin' story. The whole military testing, etc, and his dad - that's retconned out. |
|||||||
| #6 10:20am 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
WetWired
Posts: 3445
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I think I'm the only person who enjoyed the first movie, I was never a fan of the character but the first way made him interesting at least and had some intelligence to it unlike most other comic book movies (ie fantastic four)
the ending with electic boogooloo dad was the only bit I didn't like |
|||||||
| #7 10:33am 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
trog
AGN Admin
Posts: 22944
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I give that movie zero out of 10, just for its mere existence.
f***! How much must Marvel have hated the Eric Bana version to just whore it out again for a remake so soon? After watching the trailer I think I have to keep giving it zero. I never read the Hulk comics but srsly, surely they could have come up with a more interesting enemy than just bizarro-Hulk? |
|||||||
| #8 05:30pm 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
ctd
Posts: 5777
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
So glad Eric Bana turned them down to do this. Such an awesome actor/bloke doesn't need this bulls*** over again.
|
|||||||
| #9 05:43pm 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Protius
Posts: 3864
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
That looks uber gay... the first one was rad. Now Trog doesn't look like the hulk anymore.
|
|||||||
| #10 05:44pm 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Damo
Posts: 2991
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
This is not a remake, this is a continuation from the first movie..The other creature is "the abomination"
|
|||||||
| #11 06:38pm 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Bah
Posts: 2748
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
They should have got one of the current body buildersYeah thats exactly what this movie needs, a hulk with zero personality that can't act or move. |
|||||||
| #12 06:54pm 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
ravn0s
Posts: 6145
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
bizarro-Hulk? its abomination. |
|||||||
| #13 08:57pm 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Skitza
Posts: 8285
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
looks good, but why him as bruce, he looks nothing like anything remotely related to hulk/bana/.
|
|||||||
| #14 11:58pm 14/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Crakaveli
Posts: 2672
Location: USA
|
looks gas as f***, and i never saw the first lolz.
|
|||||||
| #15 12:09am 15/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
trog
AGN Admin
Posts: 22953
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Yeah thats exactly what this movie needs, a hulk with zero personality that can't act or move.As opposed to, say, a CG character? |
|||||||
| #16 10:12am 15/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Protius
Posts: 3865
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
This is not a remake, this is a continuation from the first movie..The other creature is "the abomination"Still looks s***. |
|||||||
| #17 10:19am 15/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Khel
Posts: 12293
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
As long as it has less touchy-feely bulls***, and more HULK SMASH, then I'll probably enjoy it. Also, Edward Norton looks much better in the role than Eric Bana imo. Eric Bana really overplayed the weedy, geeky scientist angle, to the point where in some scenes it almost felt like a parody.
|
|||||||
| #18 12:42pm 15/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Bah
Posts: 2749
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
As opposed to, say, a CG character?The worst cg character from the worst straight to video movie would still have more personality than a bodybuilder, and probably look more human. |
|||||||
| #19 06:24pm 15/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
fpot
Posts: 15103
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland
|
I can barely contain my own apathy for this movie.
|
|||||||
| #20 06:57am 16/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
trog
AGN Admin
Posts: 22968
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
it doesn't look like you contained it at all!!!
|
|||||||
| #21 10:07am 16/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
sLaps_Forehead
Posts: 3360
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I hate to pour salt on your circumcision but... that looks like crap.
|
|||||||
| #22 10:16pm 16/03/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Nakor
Posts: 3000
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
apologies for the thread revival
but i thought this movie was pretty fking rad, so much better than the first one two massive sequel openings though, at least one was kinda hidden amongst all the action, and last one just made me lol (tho i do admit im a bit excited to see what they do there) overall, ive really enjoyed the last 2 comic movies, ironman and this, and from the looks of it batman is up there too, so maybe hollywood have twigged on to how to make good movies |
|||||||
| #23 12:32am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Creepy
Posts: 976
Location: USA
|
It isn't Hollywood - it's the fact (with Iron Man and Hulk) that Marvel have their own productin studio now, to make movies based on comics.
Not, what Hollywood execs think a comic book character should do/think in a movie. |
|||||||
| #24 04:12am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Le Cock
Posts: 4700
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I thought the movie was sweet too. Hulk can't jump 100km in a single bound anymore which is good. Without spoiling, I'm not too keen on the sequel bombshell they drop - just don't see how it would work.
|
|||||||
| #25 08:21am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
trog
AGN Admin
Posts: 24112
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Nakor, is this a sequel to the recent one, or a whole new thing that pretends the first one didn't happen
|
|||||||
| #26 09:21am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
ravn0s
Posts: 6547
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
pretends it doesnt exist. the credits at the start were cool in the way that they revealed the hulks origins.
the movie was not quite up there with ironman, but it was still awsome. hulk smash ftw! Hulk can't jump 100km in a single bound anymore which is good. he can do that in the comic... last edited by ravn0s at 09:25:31 17/Jun/08 |
|||||||
| #27 09:25am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Le Cock
Posts: 4701
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Trog, it's sorta both. In terms of timeframe it's a sequel, but the backstory is different.
I read that it was going to be a sequel with eric dud banner but he didn't want to do it, then edward norton got it and he re-wrote the script for it so it wouldn't be a sequel anymore, with the backstory shown in quick flashbacks and dialogue that lets u pick up on what happened. It's actually a pretty sweet movie I'd see it again. |
|||||||
| #28 09:26am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
ravn0s
Posts: 6549
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
norton only re-wrote the dialogue, not the script. thats why he didnt get credited for it.
|
|||||||
| #29 09:29am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
sLaps_Forehead
Posts: 3547
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Is the CGI still crap?
|
|||||||
| #30 10:18am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Nakor
Posts: 3001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Without spoiling, I'm not too keen on the sequel bombshell they drop - just don't see how it would work. Spoiler: it was actually dropped first in ironman, if you watched after the credits, and isnt there some kinda allstar comic they've already got? only thing i couldnt work out was whether or not they were going after the hulk, or wanting him to join |
|||||||
| #31 10:40am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
ravn0s
Posts: 6553
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Spoiler:
i thought it was obvious that stark wants him to join the avengers. the hulk is one of the original members afterall. anyway thats not the sequel to the hulk, thats another movie franchise. the hint for the sequel was mr blue who will probably end up being the villain called the leader. last edited by ravn0s at 10:58:54 17/Jun/08 |
|||||||
| #32 10:58am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Primal
Posts: 2068
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Hulk Smash!!
i liked it, future films are going to be a buzz.. |
|||||||
| #33 11:26am 17/06/08 |
|
|||||||
|
system
|
--
|
|||||||
| #33 |
|
|||||||
|
| ||||||||