|
![]() |
|
| Author |
|
|||||||
|
Crakaveli
Posts: 2598
Location: USA
|
I have a 40gig ide, 80gig ide, and a 200gig Sata. If i install the OS onto the sata, will i get better performance? currently i have the os installed on the 40gig.
|
|||||||
| #0 06:22pm 30/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
system
|
--
|
|||||||
| #0 |
|
|||||||
|
jmr
Posts: 5222
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Only if the drive is faster (read no)
|
|||||||
| #1 06:41pm 30/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
mooby
Posts: 3661
Location: UK
|
id move your page file to the sata. you might notice an improvment. |
|||||||
| #2 08:55pm 30/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Zylox
Posts: 565
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
i got both in my puter... tell us if you get the "Blue screen of death" after right clicking your cd rom. The only other thing that i think it could be is virtual DVD drive related software issues...
|
|||||||
| #3 10:19pm 30/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Protius
Posts: 3761
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
i got both in my puter... tell us if you get the "Blue screen of death" after right clicking your cd rom. The only other thing that i think it could be is virtual DVD drive related software issues... You're on your own there. I also have both kind in my computer and havn't had an issue for 4 years. |
|||||||
| #4 10:32pm 30/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
parabol
Posts: 3692
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Chances are the 200GB is faster than the 40GB without SATA even coming into play.
|
|||||||
| #5 11:55pm 30/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 6710
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
what's with your reply jmr
|
|||||||
| #6 12:16am 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Raven
Posts: 2179
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
jmr is right, but if we took a rule of thumb, a 40GB drive is going to tend to be older than a 200, and most likely quicker in general, merely because of technical improvements over time.
Other things to check would be the cache size on both drives, and the DMA mode it's running in - if it's even running in DMA mode. Of course, if it's in PIO mode it's going to be chewing hideous amounts of CPU cycles. If you don't want to reinstall though, moobys idea is good too. |
|||||||
| #7 09:15am 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
trog
AGN Admin
Posts: 21816
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Not if its a 40gb 10,000 raptor!@#!@# My 72gb raptor is a mad f***ing cainor
|
|||||||
| #8 09:30am 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Mr Hardware
Posts: 2155
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
basically, you will notice an improvement, but it has nothing to do with the interface. the 40gig will most likely have 2mb of cache, the sata drive will have either 8 or 16mb of cache most likely. Thats where you will find most of the speed difference. Also, does the drive have NCQ? If so, there's another avenue of possible speed increase.
|
|||||||
| #9 09:56am 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
fade
Posts: 2997
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
people still use IDE Hard-droves?
|
|||||||
| #10 10:01am 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Mr Hardware
Posts: 2156
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
yes, because sata is only a very, very small improvement over IDE
My WD 250gb IDE 7200rpm 8mb cache drive rocks very hard, and silently. Quietest HDD on the market i reckon, and certainly was the ducks nuts when i left system building last edited by Mr Hardware at 10:05:44 31/Oct/07 |
|||||||
| #11 10:05am 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
teq
Posts: 431
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I have 9 x sata drives in my system, the only thing I use IDE for these days is CD/DVD and even thats about to change with the imminent demise of my burner
if you want performance gains without buying 10000rpm drives, just raid them up depending on what performance increases you want, you chose different raid levels |
|||||||
| #12 11:38am 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Raven
Posts: 2181
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
Not if its a 40gb 10,000 raptor!@#!@# My 72gb raptor is a mad f***ing cainor Cept that WD never made a 40GB Raptor. They come as a 36GB though. |
|||||||
| #13 12:27pm 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
dRanged
Posts: 1011
Location: Sydney, New South Wales
|
surely if you're packing more bits per square inch, then bigger capacity = faster I/O throughput
|
|||||||
| #14 01:53pm 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
teq
Posts: 435
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
except it takes longer to seek those bits
|
|||||||
| #15 01:57pm 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Crakaveli
Posts: 2601
Location: USA
|
So how do i move the page file? cut paste? Lol.
|
|||||||
| #16 02:01pm 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 6713
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
right click my computer, properties, advanced, performance settings, advanced, virtual memory
|
|||||||
| #17 02:03pm 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
d[o_0]b
Posts: 1685
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
it depends on the size of the tractor belt obviously, the throughput can only interface with certain types of DDR hardware but that all depends if its running DMD and NCQ 3rd layer protocol caching
hope this helps |
|||||||
| #18 02:05pm 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Crakaveli
Posts: 2603
Location: USA
|
||||||||
| #19 02:42pm 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Mr Hardware
Posts: 2163
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
almost, now go to c: and say no paging file on it
|
|||||||
| #20 02:46pm 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
Raven
Posts: 2183
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
Actually, having the paging file spread across multiple disks may actually help, since when accessing data it now has the throughput of two disks rather than a single.
|
|||||||
| #21 02:53pm 31/10/07 |
|
|||||||
|
system
|
--
|
|||||||
| #21 |
|
|||||||
|
| ||||||||