Was reading the news, and saw this. now, is this an unfortunate photo, or is the poor girl effected by down syndrome or some such?

is this an unfortunate photo, or is the poor girl effected by down syndrome?

I think you missed the part in the article that said:

Lauren Huxley was beaten, doused in petrol, and left for dead in a brutal attack in her Sydney home

no, i see that. but it looks nothing like that

news.com.au has been great with the unfortunate pics lately - the one of Dean Jones yesterday looked like he was midway through s***ting his pants.

news worthy of qgl: woman nearly beaten to death has odd look on her face

She really should be showing her tits.

haha
and
shame on you erik

This was her before she was attacked

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2005/12/01/laurenhuxley.jpg

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/arrest-made-over-woman-left-for-dead/2005/12/01/1133422053800.html


Sorry I don't know how to embed or link on QGL (i can do it on ultimematebb forums!)

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2005/12/01/laurenhuxley.jpg

i'd hit it

and then douse it in fuel?

nice work erik you f***ing moron :P

hey, cool it.

i wasn't making fun of the poor girl at all, as i wholeheartedly feel sorry for her after the experience that she had, but rather stating that it was a rather unfortunate photo on the behalf of the media and i would have thought that the media, who was covering the story of such a brave girl, would have used a better photo.

basically, i was going "what's up there?"

so there's no need,nf, spook and qmass, to be giving me a hard time, as ticman said, news.com.au has been having some wierd photos lately.

:P means I wasnt being serious. I just thought the

or is the poor girl effected by down syndrome or some such

was a bit harsh.

Poor girl she looks like shes in her 30's.

i'd hit it

Someone beat you to it.

rofl

ahaha

Also i believe maxe's locked thread is somehow related to this one.

I was trying to service the community, but got shut down by The Man, man

From what I can tell the shot was taken of her up on stage - maybe receiving said award??

and she looks like that because the skin has been melted away and now it is taut.

Bad taste thread and I like the OP :)

edit:spelling

last edited by Kat at 12:51:26 11/Aug/06

kat, skin cannot 'melt' so that is not why she looks like that.

It would be becuase the burns would have killed most of the flesh on her face and the best the surgeon could do was that. Even if the skin was still there, and not completely burnt away it would be like when an egg is cooked. The protein structure changes and it goes from being maliable and elastic to... not. - its called denaturation. (I dont know anything about plastic surgery though so what they leave and what can regenerate is beyond me.)

asif you wouldn't just say 'the skin melted' instead of all that s***

get over yaself

or just say the skin was f***ed up...

sorry qmass, i missunderstood

asif you wouldn't just say 'the skin melted' instead of all that s***

well the difference is that I dont think it was a result of the skin 'melting' I think its the best a surgeon can make it look after removing most of the dead s*** and grafting skin back in... so thats 2 different things.

cause he was aiming for scientific accuracy by calling it melting

ok well I'll let it slide this time

the joke is on qmass, because she was never set alight

she was never set alight

pfft, women...Always making s*** up to get attention

no s***? what the f*** is with that headline :( f*** the media.

Fun fact!

Getting burns to over 50% of your body doesn't kill you, but eventually your kidneys can't handle all the work they have to do and you die a few days later from kidney failure.

Getting burns to over 50% of your body doesn't kill you, but eventually your kidneys can't handle all the work they have to do and you die a few days later from kidney failure.

that and the chance of infection is so exponentially high that youll probably die of whatever the f*** you picked up.

True dat.

Also if you decide to leave this world via something like panadol, you will get to the hospital, get your stomach contents removed and be ok enough to think "I'm going to live!". Then you will die 5 days later from liver failure. But think of the attention you will get!

The moral of the story is to be good to your body.

I thought it was shoot yourself instead?

Shooting yourself gets the job done, it doesn't get you any attention - DUH

Shooting yourself gets the job done, it doesn't get you any attention - DUH

webcam doesn't count

so the moral of the story is to shoot yourself on a webcam?

maybe the moral is that there is no moral?