hhaha does he learn?

altho I'd hardly call it a scandal considering he is no longer married.. ???

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=64791

discuss

Warne's management did not immediately return calls.

What?

they sent text's, derr :p

f*** he is a legend.

Also 7/99 in his first bowling performance over there = double legend.

Also pics of models kthx

last edited by fpot at 20:46:56 07/May/06

There was a pretty hilarious photo in a new buliten earlier. Somone needs to dig it up and post it :P

good on him 2 modles wat a champ

plus they are 25, he is 36 (i think)

go son go

"Shane's a stallion and very willing to experiment. He loved playing around with the inflatable and was up for anything," she said.

That's a joke .. she bitch is full of s***

http://scripts.megastar.co.uk/goodies/megaposters/images/coralie/coralie_b_021.jpg

Nothing google can't find

last edited by Fade2Black at 23:50:32 07/May/06

I have never aspired to become a speechwriter, politician, or mainstream political columnist. Nevertheless, if you can look beyond my pitiable writing style you'll indisputably see that I have something important to tell you about Shane Warne. If you disagree with my claim that Shane can be described only by such words as "devious" and "mudslinging", then read no further. I don't just contend that it's time for him to face the music; I can back that up with facts. For instance, he should clarify his point so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, his homilies sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense.

Shane's tirades leave me with several unanswered questions: Why can't he value a diversity of approaches without needing to rank them as better and worse? And when he promotes one social program after the next to take care of some segment of society, is he doing it for that segment of society or is he doing it because he seeks power and position? These are difficult questions to answer, because he can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. Shane could destroy our moral fiber. It will not be easy to operate on today's real -- not tomorrow's ideal -- political terrain. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that, for the overriding reason that Shane loves getting up in front of people and telling them that children don't need as much psychological attentiveness, protection, and obedience training as the treasured household pet. He then boasts about how he'll make incorrect leaps of logic some day. It's all part of the media spectacle that is Shane Warne. Of course, he soaks it up and wallows in it like a pig in mud. Speaking of pigs and mud, Shane has announced his intentions to gain a virtual stranglehold on many facets of our educational system. While doing so may earn Shane a gold star from the mush-for-brains gangsterism crowd, everything I've said so far is by way of introduction to the key point I want to make in this letter. My key point is that I wouldn't judge his intimates too harshly. They're obviously just cannon fodder for Shane's plot to foist the most poisonously false and destructive myths imaginable upon us. In Shane's serfs' rush to join the crowd, they failed to observe that Shane says that racism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. Yet he also wants to dissolve the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of his paltry policies and wicked sentiments. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that when Shane is challenged, he either denies everything or claims that his words were taken out of context and that his enemies are plotting against him. It follows from this that Shane refers to a variety of things using the word "uncontrovertibleness". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, he's saying that sin is good for the soul, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that if my own experience has taught me anything, it's that he wants to be the one who determines what information we have access to. Yet Shane is also a big proponent of a particularly beer-guzzling form of antinomianism. Do you see something wrong with that picture? What I see is that his true goal is to make bigotry respectable. All the statements that his lickspittles make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to discuss the relationship between three converging and ever-growing factions -- naive used-car salesmen, inarticulate undesirables, and truculent champions of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine.

Shane's announcements don't accomplish anything useful because they don't deal with the real issue. The real issue is that Shane says he's going to relabel millions of people as "incorrigible" in a lustrum or two. Is he out of his inhumane mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that even his faithfuls are afraid that he will force onto us the degradation and ignominy that he is known to revel in sometime soon. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that Shane demands obeisance from his flunkies. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Shane forces them to extend his 15 minutes of fame to 15 months. And, more important, Shane managed to convince a bunch of loud lounge lizards to help him turn peaceful gatherings into embarrassing scandals. What was the quid pro quo there? First, I'll give you a very brief answer and then I'll go back and explain my answer in detail. As for the brief answer, there's an important difference between me and Shane. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. Shane, in contrast, is willing to kill for his -- or, if not to kill, at least to create some reprehensible, pseudo-psychological profile of me to discredit my opinions.

It would be downright uninformed for Shane to provide support to backwards banana republics and their dangerous dictators. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. To get even the simplest message into the consciousness of bookish, temperamental nutters, it has to be repeated at least 50 times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following 50 times, but he and his lieutenants are, by nature, foolhardy buffoons. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but if Shane makes fun of me or insults me, I hear it, and it hurts. But I take solace in the fact that I am still able to hinder the power of vapid ochlocrats like Shane. Though I don't doubt the depth of Shane's sentiments, it's rather the form of his expressions that I find both corrupt and psychotic.

In a tacit concession of defeat, Shane is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what his hotheaded, quixotic paroxysms have failed at. In a similar vein, I'm sure he wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his conversations. So why does Shane want to cast the world into nuclear holocaust? That's the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you'd also know why Shane's drones are unified under a common goal. That goal is to turn cockalorums loose against us good citizens. His propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "Merit is adequately measured by Shane's methods and qualifications" and, "'The norm' shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel". What they don't tell you, though, is that you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: Shane says that he answers to no one. You know, he can lie as much as he wants but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd unquestionably prevent anyone from hearing that the central paradox of his plans for the future, the twist that makes his rodomontades so irresistible to hate-filled, money-grubbing twaddlers, is that these people truly believe that he is omnipotent. I must, on principle, feed the starving, house the homeless, cure the sick, and still find wonder and awe in the sunrise and the moonlight. And that's the honest truth.

There were shots of shane with the two girls on the news... I want to see those. Not some random one of the slapper :P

ooooh i get it

"who cares"

perfect.

tldr

yeah i saw 2 shots of him on the news, one where hes doing a chick from behind while standing up and the other girl was watching, and another where hes walking around in a playboy jock strap.

if men as ugly as him can get models you fags shouldnt have a problem either.

evis wins at longest post ever

yeah i saw 2 shots of him on the news, one where hes doing a chick from behind while standing up and the other girl was watching

maaaa you for real ?

If you just ignore him he will go away...

Media should just get off his back already

If he's single now, and obviously prone to random girl encounters I don't see why it's anyone's business.

I wish I was prone to random girl encounters

nsfw pics here: http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/story_pages/news/news2.shtml

last edited by phatmike at 20:40:43 08/May/06

my wasted life..

I've got an email with about 6 pics but I can't access my webspace :(

NWS link and stuff.

yeah sorry should have noted that

Id kick shane warne off the aussie team if he didnt slam those filthy slappers

and the good news for shane is that girls that are willing to have a threesome with shane warne are probably only gonna be more interested in getting it on from this sort of publicity. So its win/win for warney.

so he does as any red blooded male would do and acommodate the two talent models. goto a private location to do private things. then the ho bags use whats obviously the pinnacle of their wit and set up a staged encounter, sell the footage and get filthy rich.

theres no justice in this world.

i would of sucked him off if i had of thought of this scheme earlier.

except that would be gay

yet it makes you wonder would it be worth it.

those playboy jocks he is wearing in the footage on telly is TRAGIC.

LoL maxe! 'Filthy Slappers'!

Banging those pommy molls would be like throwing a sausage down a hallway.

mate
warnie...

what a f***en legend.

just as channel 9 was gonna give him back his 300 000 contract :(

Good on him.. I would too lol... Not the blow up doll bit but..

yer... how is this a scandal? does having a fun sexlife prevent you from playing cricket or something!? :P

wwaaaaaaarrrrniieee! wwaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrniieee!

wotta ledj. :D